Trade Cases
Mexico touts Brazil steel carve out from new Section 232 regime
Written by Michael Cowden
July 11, 2024
The Mexican government said on Thursday that it had negotiated a temporary carve out for Brazilian steel under recently updated Section 232 rules.
Mexico said that the pact would stretch until 2027, by which point all steel exported to the US would have to be “melted and poured” within North America.
“A significant bilateral agreement has been reached to avoid affecting the Mexican steel industry,” the Mexican government said in a statement.
The agreement features “a mechanism ensuring that Brazilian steel processed in Mexico will not be subject to tariffs; that is, the ‘melt and pour’ requirement will not apply to products coming from Brazil,” Mexico added.
The wording of the agreement, and comments collected by SMU from industry sources, indicate that it applies primarily to Brazilian slabs.
Recall that President Joe Biden decreed on Wednesday that steel imports from Mexico would again be subject to 25% Section 232 tariffs – unless they are melted and poured in Mexico, the US, or Canada.
Certain US mills rely heavily on Brazilian slab as substrate or to supplement their own melt. And Brazilian slabs, while subject to a Section 232 quota, are exempt from the 25% tariff.
Likewise, certain Mexican mills also rely heavily not only on slabs melted and poured within the country but also on those sourced from Brazil.
A brief history
Former President Donald Trump in March 2018 introduced 25% Section 232 tariffs on imported steel. To the surprise of many, the national security measure was then extended to include not only offshore imports but material from Canada and Mexico as well.
The Trump administration rescinded Section 232 from Canada and Mexico in May 2019, but this year has seen calls from certain US legislators to re-introduce Section 232 on Mexican steel.
Michael Cowden
Read more from Michael CowdenLatest in Trade Cases
CRU: Turkey imposes tariffs on steel imports; Malaysia launches AD probe
Ankara has placed anti-dumping duties of ranging from 6.10% to 43.31% on hot-rolled steel sheet from China, India, Japan, and Russia. Meanwhile, Malaysia has announced it will investigate allegedly dumped steel wire rod from China, Indonesia, and Vietnam.
Price on trade: The excess capacity threat moves closer to home
The Global Forum on Steel Excess Capacity (GFSEC) reaffirmed on Oct. 8 what domestic steel producers have long known—the threat of excess steel capacity never disappeared and is evolving. China’s steelmakers are boosting capacity and exports, echoing the 2016 global steel crisis. There is no doubt that China is successfully weaponizing excess capacity across many industries, and the fatal damage to domestic production and national security undermines the interests of all market-oriented countries. The question now is: How will GFSEC countries respond?
US bans steel made with forced labor from Baowu subsidiary
The US has banned imports from a subsidiary of the world’s largest steelmaker because it is allegedly using forced labor to produce steel products.
China challenges Canada’s tariffs on steel, aluminum, EVs
China is challenging Canada’s decision to put tariffs on imports of Chinese steel, aluminum, and electric vehicles.
Leibowitz: Harris, Trump don’t talk much about steel and trade – because they (mostly) agree
By most accounts, the issues that are most important for voters in this election are the economy, immigration, and abortion. International trade policy plays a key role in at least two of those three (the economy and immigration). Both presidential candidates recognize that trade and tariffs are an important focus. And “America first” is a rallying point for both candidates.