Trade Cases

Senate bill looks to reimpose Section 232 tariffs on Mexico

Written by Ethan Bernard


US senators have introduced the “Stop Mexico’s Steel Surge Act,” which seeks to reimpose 25% Section 232 tariffs on Mexican steel imports.

Sens. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) and Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), joined by other senators, introduced the bipartisan legislation to “stop the dramatic increase in Mexican steel imports,” according to a statement released on Tuesday.

Additionally, Rep. Frank J. Mrvan (D.-Ind.), joined by other representatives, introduced the Stop Mexico’s Steel Surge Act in the US House of Representatives.

The senators’ statement said the legislation would reinstate the 232 tariffs on Mexican steel imports at 25% for no less than a year, “and give the president authority to impose additional quotas and tariff rate quotas on specific products if needed.”

As for the reasoning, the statement claims the Mexican government is violating the 2019 agreement that removed the tariffs, “and threatening steelworkers in Ohio and around the country.”

Recall that Mexico has said it will place retaliatory steel tariffs on the United States if the US acts to reimpose Section 232.

“Mexico’s violation of its 2019 agreement with the United States has released a surge of steel products into America that’s hurt our workers and made us less secure,” Sen. Cotton said.

“It’s past time for more negotiation. This legislation will stop Mexico from continuing to surge steel into our market,” the senator added.

Lourenco Goncalves, chairman, president, and CEO of Cleveland-Cliffs, said in the statement that Mexico, with increased steel exports to the US, has not lived up to the 2019 agreement.

“To make matters worse, Mexico has become the world capital of circumvention, allowing steel, auto parts, and manufactured products from China and other nations to be routed through Mexico to the US simply to achieve favorable tariff treatment,” Goncalves said.

In December, Brown and a bipartisan group of senators demanded the Biden administration act and set a deadline for Mexico to enforce its 2019 agreement with the US.

Steel trade groups greeted the news favorably.

Kevin Dempsey, president and CEO of the American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI), supported the legislation.

“Action is needed to address the surge in steel imports from Mexico,” he said in a statement on Tuesday.

“We continue to urge the establishment of an effective monitoring system to prevent new surges of steel into the United States from Mexico,” he added.

Likewise, Philip Bell, president of the Steel Manufacturers of America (SMA), applauded the news.

“Over the past year, the SMA has worked closely with the office of the US Trade Representative to curtail the flood of Mexican steel, and this legislation is designed to compel Mexico to act,” Bell said in a statement to SMU on Wednesday. 

SMA said the legislation “will help end the massive surge of Mexico steel coming across our border since the signing of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement.”

Ethan Bernard

Read more from Ethan Bernard

Latest in Trade Cases

Leibowitz: Trump 2.0 signals Cold War 2.0 trade and China policies

China is one of the elephants in the room as the transition to Trump 2.0 continues. While the people and policies are still being formulated, it’s possible to detect a strategy for the new Trump administration. I think there are two imperative issues that the new administration needs to balance. The Trump strategy will, I believe, follow the following points. First, trade is one of the issues that got President Trump elected in 2016 and 2024—it nearly got him elected in 2020, save for the pandemic. If President Trump had won in 2020, I might be writing chronicles about the end of his eight years in the White House now instead of projecting what the next Trump administration would accomplish or break. Oh, well—that’s life. Trade will necessarily be a key feature of relations with China for the next four years.