Trade Cases
Senate bill looks to reimpose Section 232 tariffs on Mexico
Written by Ethan Bernard
March 13, 2024
US senators have introduced the “Stop Mexico’s Steel Surge Act,” which seeks to reimpose 25% Section 232 tariffs on Mexican steel imports.
Sens. Sherrod Brown (D-Ohio) and Tom Cotton (R-Ark.), joined by other senators, introduced the bipartisan legislation to “stop the dramatic increase in Mexican steel imports,” according to a statement released on Tuesday.
Additionally, Rep. Frank J. Mrvan (D.-Ind.), joined by other representatives, introduced the Stop Mexico’s Steel Surge Act in the US House of Representatives.
The senators’ statement said the legislation would reinstate the 232 tariffs on Mexican steel imports at 25% for no less than a year, “and give the president authority to impose additional quotas and tariff rate quotas on specific products if needed.”
As for the reasoning, the statement claims the Mexican government is violating the 2019 agreement that removed the tariffs, “and threatening steelworkers in Ohio and around the country.”
Recall that Mexico has said it will place retaliatory steel tariffs on the United States if the US acts to reimpose Section 232.
“Mexico’s violation of its 2019 agreement with the United States has released a surge of steel products into America that’s hurt our workers and made us less secure,” Sen. Cotton said.
“It’s past time for more negotiation. This legislation will stop Mexico from continuing to surge steel into our market,” the senator added.
Lourenco Goncalves, chairman, president, and CEO of Cleveland-Cliffs, said in the statement that Mexico, with increased steel exports to the US, has not lived up to the 2019 agreement.
“To make matters worse, Mexico has become the world capital of circumvention, allowing steel, auto parts, and manufactured products from China and other nations to be routed through Mexico to the US simply to achieve favorable tariff treatment,” Goncalves said.
In December, Brown and a bipartisan group of senators demanded the Biden administration act and set a deadline for Mexico to enforce its 2019 agreement with the US.
Steel trade groups greeted the news favorably.
Kevin Dempsey, president and CEO of the American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI), supported the legislation.
“Action is needed to address the surge in steel imports from Mexico,” he said in a statement on Tuesday.
“We continue to urge the establishment of an effective monitoring system to prevent new surges of steel into the United States from Mexico,” he added.
Likewise, Philip Bell, president of the Steel Manufacturers of America (SMA), applauded the news.
“Over the past year, the SMA has worked closely with the office of the US Trade Representative to curtail the flood of Mexican steel, and this legislation is designed to compel Mexico to act,” Bell said in a statement to SMU on Wednesday.
SMA said the legislation “will help end the massive surge of Mexico steel coming across our border since the signing of the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement.”
Ethan Bernard
Read more from Ethan BernardLatest in Trade Cases
Trump threatens 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico as soon as Feb. 1
President Donald Trump said on Monday evening that he was considering placing tariffs of 25% on imports from Canada and Mexico. The president said the tariffs could go into effect as soon as Feb. 1. President Trump threatened the tariffs as he signed a raft of executive orders in front of reporters in the Oval […]
Leibowitz: Trump will act fast on tariffs and immigration – buckle up
The new president clearly likes tariffs, and he wants to use them to make the United States more competitive - especially in manufacturing and mining. I believe that this will not be effective. But tariffs are very likely to be announced among the early pronouncements.
Canacero disputes US allegations of Mexican steel export threat
Mexican steel trade association Canacero said steel exports from the Latin American country into the US do not pose a threat. And claims that Mexican steel exports have been the driver of US plant closures and layoffs are “unfounded,” the association said. “On the contrary, the US greatly benefits from steel trade flows and has […]
Coated steel trade case update: Postponements and new allegations
The steel industry may have to wait even longer for the initial duty determinations in the pending coated steel unfair trade investigations.
Price on Trade: Next six months will set course of trade for years to come
This may be the most consequential six months for trade policy in recent memory. The wait to see what form Trump's actions take is almost over.