Trade Cases

Mexico eyes steel tariffs on US as trade fight brews
Written by Ethan Bernard
February 28, 2024
Mexico has said it will place retaliatory steel tariffs on the United States if the US acts to reimpose Section 232 on its neighbor, according to an article in Reuters.
“Imposing tariffs on steel is not convenient for either the United States or Mexico, because if there were tariffs, they would be impacted the most, given their larger presence in the market,” Raquel Buenrostro, Mexico’s secretary of economy, was reported as saying in a press conference on Tuesday.
The words come amid escalating tensions between the two countries on the subject of steel imports. The US is threatening to reimpose Section 232 tariffs on Mexican steel imports because of what it deems a “surge.” Mexico disputes this.
Steel trade groups react
Philip K. Bell, president of the Steel Manufacturers Association (SMA), told SMU the USTR is working hard to reach an agreement with Mexico to “stop the surge in steel imports” into the US.
“Mexico is a key trading partner, and we hope the two sides can come together on a deal that brings imports back in line with historic norms and curbs transnational shipping of steel from nonmarket economies to evade US trade laws,” he added.
Kevin Dempsey, president and CEO of the American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI), said in a statement to SMU, “There is no basis for Mexico imposing tariffs on steel exports from the United States.”
He commented that the current discussions between Mexico and the US “are about ensuring that Mexico lives up to the terms of the agreement it entered into in 2019 to gain an exemption from the Section 232 tariffs.”
Dempsey said this requires “establishing an effective monitoring system to ensure that there are no surges in their exports of steel to the US.”
Like Bell, he stressed, “It also requires taking additional steps to prevent the transshipment of steel made in third countries through Mexico to avoid the Section 232 tariffs imposed on steel from other countries.”
A request for comment from the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) was not returned by time of publication.

Ethan Bernard
Read more from Ethan BernardLatest in Trade Cases

US, UK reach trade deal that includes Section 232 ‘alternative’
The US and UK governments have announced a trade deal in which an “alternative” to the Section 232 steel and aluminum tariffs will be provided.

US pols urge ‘domestically owned’ steel industry
US Sen. Jim Banks (R-Ohio) and Rep. Frank Mrvan (D-Ind.) have written a letter in support of a “domestically owned and operated American steel industry” being vital to national security.

Leibowitz: Trump takes aim at trade with a tariff ‘punt gun’
The tariffs are intended to produce more investment and jobs in US manufacturing. But first, there will be a cosmic change, potentially wiping out millions of jobs in the short run. While administration officials will no doubt cringe at the comparison, it reminds me of the effort to undercut fossil fuels production to address climate change. Led by Democrats, the effort was to destroy fossil fuels so that renewable energy sources would have more space to grow. The result: inflation and electoral defeat in 2024.

Price: Expect new trade shocks as Trump’s ‘reciprocal’ tariff negotiations continue
President Trump cast a wide net with the proposed, reciprocal tariffs. The negotiating stage will be critical to determining the success of his strategy. And for those suffering tariff whiplash, don’t expect the pace of change to slow down just because the reciprocal tariffs are entering a negotiating phase.

SMU Survey: Less support seen for Trump tariff policies
Meanwhile, an increasing number think it's too early to say whether the penalties are going to bring more manufacturing to the US.