Trade Cases
Mexico eyes steel tariffs on US as trade fight brews
Written by Ethan Bernard
February 28, 2024
Mexico has said it will place retaliatory steel tariffs on the United States if the US acts to reimpose Section 232 on its neighbor, according to an article in Reuters.
“Imposing tariffs on steel is not convenient for either the United States or Mexico, because if there were tariffs, they would be impacted the most, given their larger presence in the market,” Raquel Buenrostro, Mexico’s secretary of economy, was reported as saying in a press conference on Tuesday.
The words come amid escalating tensions between the two countries on the subject of steel imports. The US is threatening to reimpose Section 232 tariffs on Mexican steel imports because of what it deems a “surge.” Mexico disputes this.
Steel trade groups react
Philip K. Bell, president of the Steel Manufacturers Association (SMA), told SMU the USTR is working hard to reach an agreement with Mexico to “stop the surge in steel imports” into the US.
“Mexico is a key trading partner, and we hope the two sides can come together on a deal that brings imports back in line with historic norms and curbs transnational shipping of steel from nonmarket economies to evade US trade laws,” he added.
Kevin Dempsey, president and CEO of the American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI), said in a statement to SMU, “There is no basis for Mexico imposing tariffs on steel exports from the United States.”
He commented that the current discussions between Mexico and the US “are about ensuring that Mexico lives up to the terms of the agreement it entered into in 2019 to gain an exemption from the Section 232 tariffs.”
Dempsey said this requires “establishing an effective monitoring system to ensure that there are no surges in their exports of steel to the US.”
Like Bell, he stressed, “It also requires taking additional steps to prevent the transshipment of steel made in third countries through Mexico to avoid the Section 232 tariffs imposed on steel from other countries.”
A request for comment from the Office of the United States Trade Representative (USTR) was not returned by time of publication.
Ethan Bernard
Read more from Ethan BernardLatest in Trade Cases
Rebar import duties to continue for 5 more years
Import duties on rebar from a handful of countries will continue to be collected for at least another five years.
Leibowitz: Trump 2.0 signals Cold War 2.0 trade and China policies
China is one of the elephants in the room as the transition to Trump 2.0 continues. While the people and policies are still being formulated, it’s possible to detect a strategy for the new Trump administration. I think there are two imperative issues that the new administration needs to balance. The Trump strategy will, I believe, follow the following points. First, trade is one of the issues that got President Trump elected in 2016 and 2024—it nearly got him elected in 2020, save for the pandemic. If President Trump had won in 2020, I might be writing chronicles about the end of his eight years in the White House now instead of projecting what the next Trump administration would accomplish or break. Oh, well—that’s life. Trade will necessarily be a key feature of relations with China for the next four years.
Commerce says Nippon dumped steel in US in 2022-23
Commerce determined a significant dumping margin for hot-rolled steel imports from Japan's Nippon Steel.
Commerce finalizes sunset review of HR import duties
The Commerce Department determined that, if anti-dumping and countervailing duty orders were allowed to expire, or be ‘sunset,’ the illegal dumping and subsidization of HR imports would be likely to continue at sizeable rates.
Commerce delays initial CVD decision in coated case
At the request of domestic petitioners, the Commerce Department has postponed its deadline for making preliminary countervailing duty margin determinations in the coated steel trade case investigations.