Trade Cases
WTO panel rules in favor of US in 232 tariff quarrel with Turkey
Written by Laura Miller
December 19, 2023
A World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute panel has ruled in favor of the US in a case regarding retaliatory tariffs imposed by Turkey in response to Section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminum.
In 2018, the Trump Administration placed Section 232 tariffs of 25% on steel and 10% on aluminum imports for national security reasons. In response, Turkey put retaliatory tariffs on coal, paper, walnuts/almonds, tobacco, unprocessed rice, whiskey, automobiles, cosmetics, machinery equipment, and petrochemical products from the US, according to Reuters.
The WTO panel’s Dec. 19 ruling recognized the Section 232 levies are a security measure enacted by the US and that Turkey is violating WTO rules by imposing “retaliatory tariffs disguised as safeguard measures,” Sam Michel, spokesperson for the office of US Trade Representative Katherine Tai, said in a statement.
“The WTO does not have the authority to second-guess a WTO member’s response to threats to its security, and WTO reform must ensure that issues of national security cannot be reviewed in WTO dispute settlement,” Michel said.
The panel has recommended that Turkey “bring its WTO-inconsistent measure into conformity with its obligations under” the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade 1994.
Additionally, non-market excess capacity from China, Turkey, and others “is an existential threat to market-oriented steel and aluminum sectors and, through the effects on imports, a threat to US national security, including by eroding US steel and aluminum manufacturing capacity,” Michel said.
He added that the WTO has been ineffective at dealing with non-market excess capacity.
Laura Miller
Read more from Laura MillerLatest in Trade Cases
Commerce sets initial CVDs of 0-140% in coated steel trade case
The Commerce Department on Tuesday issued preliminary subsidy rates in the corrosion-resistant steel (CORE) trade case. The agency set minimal countervailing duty (CVD) rates for Brazil and Mexico, mostly high rates for Vietnam, and low rates for Canada, except for one privately held distributor. Commerce assigned that company, Nova Steel, and a handful of Vietnamese […]
Tampa Steel Conference: Trade attorney says brace for turbulence
Steel and aluminum have been identified as high priorities for trade
Trudeau, Trump agree to push tariffs until March
Canada fights back, a little As this article was about to be posted, Canada had not backed down to US President Trump’s 25% tariffs coming for Canadian goods at the stroke of midnight. In fact, the Government of Canada had pushed back, saying it would implement 25% tariffs on $155 billion worth of US products […]
US shelves Mexico tariffs until next month
“It is not by imposing tariffs that problems are resolved, but by talking and dialoguing,” President Claudia Sheinbaum said.
Leibowitz on trade: How much will the Trump tariffs hurt the US? How much will they help?
The benefits from higher tariffs are speculative and unproven. The disruptions caused by tariffs and other trade restrictions are better documented and cannot be rationally denied. For the tariffs to be good policy, the Trump argument must therefore be sure that the benefits to the US exceed the cost of these disruptions. Otherwise, we have madness masquerading as policy.