Trade Cases
Coalition voices concern about potential duties on tin mill products
Written by Laura Miller
December 4, 2023
A coalition of manufacturers, retailers, and stakeholders stands opposed to the imposition of import duties on tin mill products.
Recall that the International Trade Commission (ITC) and the Department of Commerce’s International Trade Administration (ITA) are conducting a trade case investigating the alleged dumping and subsidization of tin mill products from a host of countries. The case was requested by Cleveland-Cliffs and the United Steelworkers (USW) union.
On Nov. 30, a group led by the Consumer Brands Association sent a letter to the two agencies voicing their concerns about how the potential tariffs would hurt US manufacturing and raise consumer prices.
Among the 28 signers of the letter were the Can Manufacturers Institute, the American Coatings Association, the Agriculture Transportation Coalition, and the National Foreign Trade Council.
“Domestic tin mill steel producers currently have the capacity to supply only approximately 50% of total US demand,” the letter said. Additionally, “Certain types and widths of steel required by US can manufacturers, including two-piece can steel, are not available in sufficient commercial quantities from domestic suppliers,” the group pointed out.
“Certain types of steel required within the can industry … currently are only sourced through imports,” the letter notes.
“…We believe there is substantial product differentiation and reason for subject imports apart from cost,” it added.
“It is evident that the proposed tariffs would result in serious injury to American consumers and manufacturers in the form of lost jobs and higher prices at the grocery store. We, the makers of America’s favorite household products, urge the ITC and the Department of Commerce to follow the facts and reject this dangerous proposal,” stated David Chavern, president and CEO of Consumer Brands.
In June, a bipartisan group of 36 members of Congress also expressed their concerns over the potential tariffs due to the downstream impact on manufacturers.
Preliminary ITA rulings
The ITA made its initial ruling in the antidumping portion of the case in August. It found that Canada, China, and Germany dumped the subject goods at margins of 5.29-122.52%. It also said the Netherlands, Taiwan, Turkey, and the UK did not dump the product.
In the countervailing duty part of the case, the ITA determined preliminary countervailable subsidy rates of 89.02-542.55% for China.
Laura Miller
Read more from Laura MillerLatest in Trade Cases
Mills allege ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case vs. South Africa, UAE
"Recent activity in the marketplace strongly indicates that these imports are being rushed into the United States in an effort to avoid the imposition of antidumping duties," petitioners said.
European Commission eyes retaliation vs. Trump steel tariffs: Report
The European Commission is looking into making current quotas on steel imports stricter as a countermeasure to President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the US, according to an article in Reuters.
Trump could levy tariffs on auto imports in April: Report
President Donald Trump said last week that he could place tariffs on auto imports, according to an article in Politico.
Section 232 tariffs are headed downstream
The Trump administration has revealed the list of derivative steel products being added to the Section 232 tariff list.
Leibowitz: In Trump’s brave new world of tariffs, what will stick and what will courts challenge?
With a chronic trade deficit, the administration will continue to cite more tariffs as necessary. This is in error, as noted above. Yet the base of President Trump’s support does not see it that way. More tariffs are possible. But the only way to reduce the US trade deficit substantially is to close the gap between savings and investment in the United States.