Trade Cases
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d5d2d/d5d2dd9986ac92434e91f9237913d4b05bd9600a" alt=""
AISI Seeks Revocation of Certain Section 232 Exclusions
Written by Michael Cowden
February 15, 2021
The American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) remains concerned that General Approved Exclusions (GAEs) to Section 232 tariffs and quotas could lead to a surge in imports, the head of the lobbying group said.
“This (GAEs) is not ending the entire Section 232 program by any means. But it has the potential to degrade the program–so we think it’s a serious concern,” AISI President and Chief Executive Officer Kevin Dempsey said in an interview with Steel Market Update.
The AISI expressed its worries to the Trump administration in early January and officially reiterated its concerns to the Biden administration in a letter to the Commerce Department earlier this month.
GAEs went into effect at the end of December. It is too early to say whether they have impacted trade flows to date. But there is the potential for more imports to come in free of Section 232 tariffs because of them—and so action is required, Dempsey said.
“What we are asking is for them (Commerce) to revoke the GAEs to stop allowing products to come in duty free,” he said. “They need a more formal process… They need to go through each one of them and make sure they are not allowing an exclusion that encompasses product that can be made by the domestic industry.”
Commerce has identified 108 product codes under the Harmonized Tariff Schedule (HTS) that could be imported into the U.S. free of Section 232 tariffs. Among that list are hot-rolled sheet and strip, cold-rolled sheet and strip, as well as coated flat-rolled steel. The AISI is seeking “immediate revocation” of those 108 GAEs pending a review process.
The problem with GAEs–despite some improvements in the language governing them–remains that they conflate specific exemption requests with entire HTS codes. The intention was to speed up the Section 232 exemption process, but that might not be the effect in practice, Dempsey said.
An exclusion request for a small volume of a proprietary grade not made by a U.S. mill is not a problem. “It’s another thing to say that everything that falls under the same HTS category as the proprietary product is now exempt,” Dempsey said. “They capture a lot more product.”
But not everyone shares the view that too many imports are a problem for a U.S. steel market characterized by high prices and limited supplies.
Steel Market Update’s average hot-rolled coil price stands at $1,200 per ton ($60/cwt), its highest reading ever and well above prices abroad.
Other market participants–including some producer sources–said more steel needs to be allowed into the U.S. market from abroad to avoid harming the competitiveness of downstream manufacturers.
“What people are missing is we kept all the steel jobs but lost stamping, tube and port jobs” as a result of Section 232, one industry source said.
And the Section 232 exclusion process is already so complicated that it can make selling steel from abroad impractical. A company seeking to bring foreign steel into the U.S. might struggle to quote a competitive price unless it is exempt from the tariff regime, he said.
But to get an exemption, an importer often must specify how many tons a customer requires. The problem: buyers are typically leery of committing to tons unless they know the price, the industry source said.
“You have to roll the dice. … You have to price it as if you have an exclusion in order to get the order,” he said.
By Michael Cowden, Michael@SteelMarketUpdate.com
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e85b/0e85b534aa18ed768d08292a0e3affc4d77d582c" alt=""
Michael Cowden
Read more from Michael CowdenLatest in Trade Cases
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3a8a/d3a8a44458f8535cda37f74ca219e1e0e2ea9882" alt=""
Mills allege ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case vs. South Africa, UAE
"Recent activity in the marketplace strongly indicates that these imports are being rushed into the United States in an effort to avoid the imposition of antidumping duties," petitioners said.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd5cc/cd5ccf8fcd610d16dc861faee6fe045ca677cc79" alt=""
European Commission eyes retaliation vs. Trump steel tariffs: Report
The European Commission is looking into making current quotas on steel imports stricter as a countermeasure to President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the US, according to an article in Reuters.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1df9/c1df9ccee32d1383fa0b9bd73a6e14fd64318936" alt="The White House"
Trump could levy tariffs on auto imports in April: Report
President Donald Trump said last week that he could place tariffs on auto imports, according to an article in Politico.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4ede/c4ede29c075e98ef5ee69f321caea25835be56b8" alt=""
Section 232 tariffs are headed downstream
The Trump administration has revealed the list of derivative steel products being added to the Section 232 tariff list.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84bda/84bda1ccb5c0ca2fd6f7fcd8c2ca758876bf3bbb" alt=""
Leibowitz: In Trump’s brave new world of tariffs, what will stick and what will courts challenge?
With a chronic trade deficit, the administration will continue to cite more tariffs as necessary. This is in error, as noted above. Yet the base of President Trump’s support does not see it that way. More tariffs are possible. But the only way to reduce the US trade deficit substantially is to close the gap between savings and investment in the United States.