Aluminum

Canada’s steel, aluminum industries call for tariff alignment with US
Written by Laura Miller
August 12, 2024
Canada’s steel and aluminum industries have joined forces to call on the government for the imposition of tariffs on steel, aluminum, and electric vehicles.
Catherine Cobden, president of the Canadian Steel Producers Association (CSPA), and Jean Simard, president and CEO of the Aluminum Association of Canada (AAC), released a joint statement on Aug. 8, taking aim at overcapacity in China flooding the Canadian market with cheap imports.
The two leaders called China’s overcapacity a “clear and present danger.” They urged the government to take action to “protect Canada from the real threat of unfair trade to our economic prosperity and to our trading relationships in North America.”
Cobden and Simard point out that Canada’s USMCA trading partners, the US and Mexico, have already taken action to restrict imports of Chinese steel and aluminum. They said this is the opportunity for Canada to align itself with its partners “to ensure we live up to the trade partnerships we have forged over the past decades.”
“Failure to act exposes Canada to becoming the North American entry point for steel, aluminium as well as EVs from China’s high carbon excess capacity,” the leaders stated.
They called for swift action and a holistic approach with one tariff package covering steel, aluminum, and EVs, aligned with the tariffs Canada’s largest trading partner, the US.
“Relying solely on the use of traditional trade remedy actions or lengthy investigations would leave Canada far behind its trading partners, and highly vulnerable,” they warned.
“A CUSMA full tariff alignment for aluminum and steel should be seen as part of a comprehensive package of measures including EVs to be put in place against China,” they stated. “For steel, at least 25% tariffs should be imposed on all melted and poured Chinese steel entering Canada. For aluminum, full alignment in scope and quantum with final US Section 301 tariffs on imports of Chinese aluminum products.”

Laura Miller
Read more from Laura MillerLatest in Aluminum

Wittbecker on Aluminum: Unpacking the chaos
The aluminum market is facing a wave of uncertainty following the latest Section 232 tariffs, leaving many in the industry asking the same key questions – from why the Midwest Premium isn’t reacting as expected to how these tariffs will impact Canada, value-added products, and scrap flows – there’s plenty to unpack. We’ve put together […]

Wittbecker on Aluminum: Where are Midwest premiums headed?
Let's take a look at different tariff scenarios.

US importers face stricter rules under revamped S232 tariffs
“CBP expects full compliance from the trade community for accurate reporting and payment of the additional duties. CBP will take enforcement action on non-compliance," the agency said in a March 7 bulletin.

Wittbecker on aluminum: Another Trump tariff flip-flop brings more market turmoil
Imposing country-of-origin duties plus the upwardly revised Section 232 duties would create an untenable value for Midwest P1020. Modeling the extreme outcome of 25% country-of-origin tariffs plus 25% Section 232 tariffs could put Midwest physical premiums as high as $0.65 per pound. No, that is not a typo: $0.65 per pound! Primary aluminum supply chains would rotate from importing Canadian aluminum to importing it from India, the Middle East, or other very distant origins. That is worrisome for manufacturers.

Wittbecker on Aluminum: Is China’s removal of VAT an admission of defeat?
The demise of the VAT rebate system in China might be the most tangible sign that Beijing realizes that its unbridled access to global markets is over. There was no point in continuing a system of financial incentives to the export sector when the tariff headwinds were getting stronger.