Final Thoughts
Final Thoughts
Written by Michael Cowden
August 15, 2023
I wrote on Sunday about U.S. Steel being for sale and Cleveland-Cliffs announcing that it was the among bidders for the iconic Pittsburgh-based steelmaker.
I have heard some interesting theories on who the other bidders might be. Foreign mills, domestic mills, private equity – even Elon Musk, which I think is when things started to really jump the shark.
The speculation regarding Musk probably started because Twitter now has the same logo as U.S. Steel’s ticker symbol. Namely, “X.”
I don’t have anything to add to that speculation. I’d rather instead bring attention back to the day-to-day steel market and to facts that we do know.
We reported today that sheet prices have again moved lower. I’ll focus on hot-rolled coil (HRC) here.
As most of you know, we report a range. The low end of our range is $730 per ton ($36.50 per cwt). That represents prices for buyers capable of ordering thousands of tons. It also reflects pricing from mills in eastern Canada.
The higher end of our range is $800 per ton, which is where small spot transactions continue to happen.
Suffice it to say that we’re a far cry from the $950 per ton some US mills said they were seeking just two months ago. So where do things go from here?
SMU is not in the price forecasting business, so I won’t speculate where prices might be in a week or a month from now. But I will speculate on a key event – no, not who might buy U.S. Steel – that could drive them. That would be the possibility of a United Auto Workers (UAW) union strike.
I know one theory is that prices have drifted lower because buyers are concerned about a potential United Auto Workers (UAW) strike against Ford, General Motors, or Stellantis. Perhaps against all three.
Attention has focused on when the current contract between the UAW and the “Big Three” expires: Sept. 14 at 11:59 pm.
It’s also focused on heated rhetoric and theatrics. UAW president Sean Fain throwing away a contract proposal from Stellantis. Former Ford CEO Mark Fields accusing the union of “going back to the 20th century.”
That’s good for headlines. But does anyone really think Fain didn’t have another copy of the contract? It’s not like it was etched by hand on parchment. And I think the comment about going back to the 20th century misses the mark too.
Let’s focus for a moment when that UAW contract began: 2019. Think for a minute of all that’s changed since then. The pandemic, the snapback in demand afterward, record profits at mills and automakers, and a labor shortage. I should also add that the Biden administration has been hugely supportive of unions.
Is the UAW going to get the 40% wage increase it’s asking for? That seems unlikely. But it’s hardly alone in seeking double-digit pay gains.
The USW secured 20% in contract negotiations last year. And I’m guessing companies and their boards across a range of industries know that they’ll have to offer some big improvements in pay. (Just ask United Airlines, which agreed to a raise of 35-40% for unionized pilots.)
Do the automakers nonetheless have to show to their shareholders and boards that they put up a fight? Probably. Likewise, UAW leadership needs to show to the rank and file that it put up a fight too.
I know there’s been a lot of handicapping the possibility of a strike. Here’s one more theory to consider: Perhaps there is a short strike or lockout. Each side gets some of what they want, neither loses face.
I suggest that because a protracted strike or lockout wouldn’t be in the interest of anyone. And I’d like to think there are cool enough heads on all sides to realize that.
Michael Cowden
Read more from Michael CowdenLatest in Final Thoughts
Final Thoughts
SMU looks back at stories from Decembers past, one, five, 10, and 100 years ago.
Final Thoughts
It's that time of year again. You know, that time when people wonder if those things are drones in New Jersey or if the aliens are ready to come onto the stage just in time for Inauguration Day. What will that do for steel price volatility? In any case, the SMU team finds itself in Pittsburgh this week.
Final Thoughts
The Community Chat last Wednesday with ITR economist Taylor St. Germain is worth listening to if you couldn’t tune in live. You can find the replay and Taylor’s slide deck here. You can also find SMU reporter Stephanie Ritenbaugh’s writeup of the webinar here. Taylor is Alan Beaulieu’s protégé at ITR. Many of you know Alan from his talks at SMU Steel Summit. I found Taylor’s analysis just as insightful as Alan’s.
Final Thoughts
Cracks have formed in what has been presented as the Biden administration’s united front against Nippon Steel’s play for U.S. Steel. A report from the Financial Times said parts of the administration are at odds on the deal.
Final Thoughts
It’s been another week of torrid speculation when it comes Trump and tariffs. And another week of mostly flat price movement when it comes to steel sheet and plate. As far as Trump and tariffs go, I think I might have lost track. We've potentially got 10% blanket tariffs on imports from China, 25% tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico, 100% tariffs on the BRICs, and 200% on Caterpillar. Canada might be the 51st state. Mexico could be the 52nd state. But all can be resolved if you stop by Mar-a-Lago and kiss the ring?