Trade Cases
South Korea Demands New Deal with U.S. on Section 232: Reports
Written by Michael Cowden
November 19, 2021
South Korea wants the U.S. to start negotiations to ease Section 232 on its steel exports as soon as possible, according to local media reports.
The latest call came during meetings this week between U.S. trade officials and their South Korean counterparts in Seoul.
“We once again delivered our stance and concerns regarding the Section 232 rules, and demanded that the two sides begin negotiations at an early date,” Seoul’s Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy said, according to a report by South Korea’s Yonhap News Agency.
The Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) did not confirm whether Section 232 was discussed. But the agency noted that USTR Katherine Tai, the top U.S. trade negotiator, met with South Korean Trade Minister Yeo Han-koo over various issues, including steel and aluminum.
“Ambassador Tai shared her concerns over the challenges posed by global nonmarket excess capacity in the steel and aluminum sectors,” USTR said in a readout of the meeting released on Friday, Nov. 19. And the two sides “agreed to continued engagement between the United States and Korea on trade and economic issues in the future.”
Tai’s meeting with Yeo came after she met earlier in the week with Japanese trade officials over similar issues.
South Korea, like Japan, has sought a new deal on Section 232 after the European Union negotiated a tariff-rate quota (TRQ), or soft quota, late last month. That agreement could serve as a template for future trade pacts with other allies.
Section 232 tariffs – 25% on foreign steel and 10% on foreign aluminum – where implemented in 2018 by the Trump administration on national security grounds. That irritated traditional U.S. allies such as Japan and South Korea, which disagreed with the idea that their steel and aluminum threatened U.S. national interests.
South Korea received an exemption from Section 232 tariffs of 25% on steel by agreeing to an absolute, or “hard,” quota in 2018. That’s an annual quota that is divided up into quarterly allotments, and volumes are determined separately for individual steel products. For hot-rolled coil, for example, South Korea’s annual limit for 2021 is 446,098 short tons (404,694 metric tonnes). Once that threshold is reached, no more South Korean hot band can be brought into the U.S. until the quota refreshes on Jan. 1, 2022.
A new deal with South Korea would be important because the country is the largest steel supplier to the United States outside of the Americas. The East Asian nation shipped 2.01 million short tons (1.83 million metric tonnes) to the U.S. in 2020, according to Commerce Department figures. Only Canada (5.25 million tons), Brazil (4.05 million tons), and Mexico (3.32 million tons) shipped more.
By Michael Cowden, Michael@SteelMarketUpdate.com
Michael Cowden
Read more from Michael CowdenLatest in Trade Cases
Mills allege ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case vs. South Africa, UAE
"Recent activity in the marketplace strongly indicates that these imports are being rushed into the United States in an effort to avoid the imposition of antidumping duties," petitioners said.
European Commission eyes retaliation vs. Trump steel tariffs: Report
The European Commission is looking into making current quotas on steel imports stricter as a countermeasure to President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the US, according to an article in Reuters.
Trump could levy tariffs on auto imports in April: Report
President Donald Trump said last week that he could place tariffs on auto imports, according to an article in Politico.
Section 232 tariffs are headed downstream
The Trump administration has revealed the list of derivative steel products being added to the Section 232 tariff list.
Leibowitz: In Trump’s brave new world of tariffs, what will stick and what will courts challenge?
With a chronic trade deficit, the administration will continue to cite more tariffs as necessary. This is in error, as noted above. Yet the base of President Trump’s support does not see it that way. More tariffs are possible. But the only way to reduce the US trade deficit substantially is to close the gap between savings and investment in the United States.