Trade Cases

Nucor CEO: U.S. to 'Move Away' From S232 on EU, Mulling TRQ or CBAM
Written by Michael Cowden
October 21, 2021
The U.S. will “move away” from Section 232 tariffs on steel from the European Union, Nucor’s top executive said.
“What the final outcome looks like – whether it’s a tariff rate quota, we’ll wait and see,” Leon Topalian, president and CEO of the Charlotte, N.C.-based steelmaker, said during a conference call with analysts on Thursday.
A tariff rate quota, or TRQ, would result in the EU receiving a quota. No tariff on imports would be applied unless imports from the region exceeded that quota.
And lobbyists for domestic steelmakers have hinted that a TRQ could replace Section 232 on the EU.
A carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) is also being considered, Topalian suggested.
“Absolutely there have been conversations. And we are going to continue to work with the administration in Washington,” he said when an analyst asked about a potential CBAM.
Topalian, the CEO of North America’s largest steelmaker, is not alone in that position. Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. President and CEO Lourenco Goncalves – head of the largest sheet producer in the U.S. – said this summer that his company would support a carbon border adjustment process replacing Section 232.
A carbon border adjustment should benefit electric arc furnace (EAF) steelmakers like Nucor because they have among the lowest CO2 emissions in the world. And both Congress and American consumers should be aware of that, Topalian said.
But the devil is in the details. “Nucor has provided our commentary and analysis of what a border adjustment tax must include. … We are going to be very vocal, and we are going to continue to advocate,” Topalian said.
However, he was also quick to praise Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo and United States Trade Representative (USTR) Katherine Tai for their work on Section 232 as well as a possible replacements to it.
Nucor holds both in “high regard” for their nuanced knowledge of the steel industry, steel markets and steel trade policy – including carbon issues, he said. Both “have done a great job.”
And while Section 232 will “go away at some point,” it has served well as “a vehicle to bring other nations to the negotiating table,” Topalian said.
Topalian’s comments come as top U.S. trade officials have met in recent days with key stakeholders in the EU about resolving their differences on Section 232.
Case in point: USTR Tai and Deputy USTR Jayme White met in Brussels on Thursday with Bernd Lange, chair of the European Parliament’s International Trade Committee – the first such meeting since the two sides met in July in Washington, D.C.
Among the topics discussed were “the importance of finding a fair outcome to the steel and aluminum dispute,” according to a readout of the meeting from the Office of the USTR.
Ambassador Tai also met on Thursday in Brussels with European Steel Association (EUROFER) Director General Axel Eggert about steel trade policy. Among the topics discussed were excess global steelmaking capacity and related “market distortions” that have harmed workers in both the U.S. and the EU, the Office of the USTR said.
The U.S. has proposed policies that would “ensure the long-term viability of the American and European steel and aluminum industries and strengthen the transatlantic relationship between the U.S. and EU,” according to a readout of that meeting.
The United States and the European Union want to resolve their differences surrounding Section 232 tariffs on the EU – perhaps by as soon as Nov. 1.
By Michael Cowden, Michael@SteelMarketUpdate.com

Michael Cowden
Read more from Michael CowdenLatest in Trade Cases

SMU Survey: Less support seen for Trump tariff policies
Meanwhile, an increasing number think it's too early to say whether the penalties are going to bring more manufacturing to the US.

CRU: USW seeks exclusion for Canada from Trump’s tariffs
The union is also urging stronger enforcement against countries such as China which break trade rules, and a coordinated Canada-US strategy to protect union jobs across the North America

Price on trade: A lot happened last week – and it wasn’t all about tariffs
Should foreign investment be allowed to reshape the American steel Industry? Not to be lost in the recent on-again-off-again tariff frenzy, Nippon Steel’s proposed takeover of U.S. Steel has also found itself in President Trump’s crosshairs when it comes to trade and industrial policy. Nippon Steel initially announced its nearly $15-billion bid for U.S. Steel […]

Trump signs executive order aimed at making US shipbuilding ‘great again’
President Trump on Wednesday signed an executive order meant to breathe new life into American shipbuilding and curb Chinese dominance in the sector.

Trump still against selling USS to Japanese firm: Report
Despite ordering a new review of Nippon Steel’s bid for U.S. Steel, President Trump said he is still against selling USS to a Japanese company, according to media reports.