Trade Cases
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/media/k2/items/src/33cc7db714ad3500f0b1d38f5cae6565.jpg)
Nucor CEO: U.S. to 'Move Away' From S232 on EU, Mulling TRQ or CBAM
Written by Michael Cowden
October 21, 2021
The U.S. will “move away” from Section 232 tariffs on steel from the European Union, Nucor’s top executive said.
“What the final outcome looks like – whether it’s a tariff rate quota, we’ll wait and see,” Leon Topalian, president and CEO of the Charlotte, N.C.-based steelmaker, said during a conference call with analysts on Thursday.
A tariff rate quota, or TRQ, would result in the EU receiving a quota. No tariff on imports would be applied unless imports from the region exceeded that quota.
And lobbyists for domestic steelmakers have hinted that a TRQ could replace Section 232 on the EU.
A carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM) is also being considered, Topalian suggested.
“Absolutely there have been conversations. And we are going to continue to work with the administration in Washington,” he said when an analyst asked about a potential CBAM.
Topalian, the CEO of North America’s largest steelmaker, is not alone in that position. Cleveland-Cliffs Inc. President and CEO Lourenco Goncalves – head of the largest sheet producer in the U.S. – said this summer that his company would support a carbon border adjustment process replacing Section 232.
A carbon border adjustment should benefit electric arc furnace (EAF) steelmakers like Nucor because they have among the lowest CO2 emissions in the world. And both Congress and American consumers should be aware of that, Topalian said.
But the devil is in the details. “Nucor has provided our commentary and analysis of what a border adjustment tax must include. … We are going to be very vocal, and we are going to continue to advocate,” Topalian said.
However, he was also quick to praise Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo and United States Trade Representative (USTR) Katherine Tai for their work on Section 232 as well as a possible replacements to it.
Nucor holds both in “high regard” for their nuanced knowledge of the steel industry, steel markets and steel trade policy – including carbon issues, he said. Both “have done a great job.”
And while Section 232 will “go away at some point,” it has served well as “a vehicle to bring other nations to the negotiating table,” Topalian said.
Topalian’s comments come as top U.S. trade officials have met in recent days with key stakeholders in the EU about resolving their differences on Section 232.
Case in point: USTR Tai and Deputy USTR Jayme White met in Brussels on Thursday with Bernd Lange, chair of the European Parliament’s International Trade Committee – the first such meeting since the two sides met in July in Washington, D.C.
Among the topics discussed were “the importance of finding a fair outcome to the steel and aluminum dispute,” according to a readout of the meeting from the Office of the USTR.
Ambassador Tai also met on Thursday in Brussels with European Steel Association (EUROFER) Director General Axel Eggert about steel trade policy. Among the topics discussed were excess global steelmaking capacity and related “market distortions” that have harmed workers in both the U.S. and the EU, the Office of the USTR said.
The U.S. has proposed policies that would “ensure the long-term viability of the American and European steel and aluminum industries and strengthen the transatlantic relationship between the U.S. and EU,” according to a readout of that meeting.
The United States and the European Union want to resolve their differences surrounding Section 232 tariffs on the EU – perhaps by as soon as Nov. 1.
By Michael Cowden, Michael@SteelMarketUpdate.com
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2024/02/SMU_MC_headshot-150x150.png)
Michael Cowden
Read more from Michael CowdenLatest in Trade Cases
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/images/Featured_News_Icons/galvanized_coil.png)
Leibowitz: The consequences of a new barrage of trade cases on coated steel
Domestic steel producers and the United Steelworkers (USW) union filed a barrage of trade cases last week. This is hardly news. Ever since the Commerce Department ruled that Vietnam is still treated as a nonmarket economy (NME) for antidumping purposes, many in the business expected new cases on the product that Vietnam excels at—“corrosion-resistant steel.” Nor is it a surprise that these cases roped in nine countries in addition to Vietnam: Australia, Brazil, Canada, Mexico, the Netherlands, South Africa, Taiwan, Turkey, and the United Arab Emirates. All these countries rank in the top ten exporters of corrosion-resistant steel to the United States. These petitions are a broadside against coated flat-rolled steel imports.
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/images/Featured_News_Icons/investigate.png)
Coated trade case alleges hefty dumping margins
Domestic mills have alleged substantial dumping margins in the trade case targeting imports of corrosion-resistant steel.
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/images/Featured_News_Icons/fist.png)
US mills file sprawling trade case against coated imports from 10 nations
US mills have filed or soon will file a sprawling trade petition against imports of coated flat-rolled steel from 10 countries. The petition seeks anti-dumping margins against Canada, Mexico, Brazil, the Netherlands, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates, Vietnam, Taiwan, Australia, and South Africa. It also seeks countervailing duty margins against Canada, Mexico, Brazil, and Vietnam. That’s according documents dated Sept. 5 and addressed to Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo and International Trade Commission (ITC) Secretary Lisa Barton.
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/media/k2/items/src/cbd2ad03f626e665deb71b2742b25bbb.jpg)
Steel Summit 2024: Trade issues abound ahead of election
Trade is always front and center in an election year. And 2024 is no different. There is no shortage of issues, with questions like the sale of U.S. Steel to Japan’s Nippon Steel, potential cracks in the USMCA, and Chinese overcapacity dominating the headlines. But how do you distinguish between issues that might just last until November, and what are the crucial questions that could affect your business for years to come?
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/images/Featured_News_Icons/fist.png)
US senators urge reduction to S. Korean OCTG quota
https://www.brown.senate.gov/newsroom/press/release/sherrod-brown-casey-fetterman-biden-administration-level-playing-field-american-octg-industry