Trade Cases
How Do U.S. Steel Duties Compare to Other Nations?
Written by Tim Triplett
March 11, 2018
President Trump made headlines this week when he slapped a 25 percent tariff on steel imports from all nations except Canada and Mexico. His rationale is that the U.S. should treat other countries the way they treat us. Steel Market Update has heard many incorrect statements about how the rest of the industrialized world treats U.S. exports. Closer examination shows that the administration’s claims of inequity are not necessarily true, at least when it comes to steel.
The United States exports steel products to Canada, Mexico and other countries, as well as scrap, iron ore and other inputs used to make steel, in most cases paying no duty at all, said Washington trade attorney Lewis Leibowitz.
He points to the Uruguay Round of trade negotiations in the early 1990s in which the industrialized nations agreed to a “zero for zero” policy, eliminating tariffs on steel, as well as fish, beer, pharmaceuticals, paper, wood, non-ferrous metals, electronics and construction equipment. In the United States, the reductions were phased in over a five-year period, hitting zero by 1999. The same was true for the EU, Japan and other countries.
“So, developed-world tariffs on steel are essentially zero,” said Leibowitz. “The only duties now are AD/CVD duties, some safeguard duties (e.g., India) and now the 25 percent duties courtesy of President Trump.”
Other nations have higher duties than the U.S. on other products. For example, the EU has higher duties on cars. But not on steel products, he added.
A March 8 Washington Post report concludes that the U.S. has one of the most open markets for trade, but it disputes the Trump administration’s claim that the U.S. has the lowest tariffs and the lowest non-tariff barriers in the world.
SMU Publisher John Packard participated in a steel panel at the FMA annual meeting in Scottsdale this past week. During that panel, comments were made advising the attendees that Europe and other industrialized nations place duties on U.S. steel products. There are countries (like China) that do have duties, but as Leibowitz explained, most industrial nations do not collect duties on steel.
Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Trade Cases
Price: Should billions in Section 232 revenue go to foreign manufacturers or to the American people?
Do we want the benefits of the Section 232 tariffs to flow to the bottom lines of foreign steel and aluminum producers or to the US government and, ultimately, domestic manufacturers and their workers? In our view, the answer is simple. Section 232 exceptions do nothing more than lead to underserved profits for foreign manufacturers who are harming the US industrial base. That revenue could be used to pursue the Trump administration’s other policy priorities - such as deficit reduction or expanded tax cuts.
Mills allege ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case vs. South Africa, UAE
"Recent activity in the marketplace strongly indicates that these imports are being rushed into the United States in an effort to avoid the imposition of antidumping duties," petitioners said.
European Commission eyes retaliation vs. Trump steel tariffs: Report
The European Commission is looking into making current quotas on steel imports stricter as a countermeasure to President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the US, according to an article in Reuters.
Trump could levy tariffs on auto imports in April: Report
President Donald Trump said last week that he could place tariffs on auto imports, according to an article in Politico.
Section 232 tariffs are headed downstream
The Trump administration has revealed the list of derivative steel products being added to the Section 232 tariff list.