Steel Mills
Letter to the Editor: Steel Mills Face a Real Conundrum
Written by John Packard
January 11, 2015
Steel Market Update received an email late last week that spoke to the problems the domestic steel mills are facing right now: a weak global steel market, strong dollar, all U.S. production facilities up and running, growing steel inventories, low in-put costs and a collapse in demand from the energy sector. We thought our readers would be interested in this steel executive’s opinions about the future of the industry and steel prices:
“We are moving into a fascinating market. The mills have nearly every market factor working against them: high imports which show no sign of abating yet, a globally weak steel market, strengthening US dollar, strong/stable domestic production, higher and still growing inventories, iron input costs which are low and staying/moving lower (Iron Ore, DRI, Pig Iron, Scrap, etc), an abrupt collapse in demand from the Energy sector – especially OCTG – due to dramatic falling oil prices, and lastly, very weak order books. The exception is the relatively stable domestic demand picture in the US, especially vs. the rest of the world.
“The mills have successfully consolidated, and yet they face a real conundrum: as their input costs continue to move lower, and now any energy-related expenses are moving lower as well, their break-even margins continue to move lower at the same time. Thus, while the market can only absorb so much volume given the current supply/demand dynamics, the mills can make money on any ton they can sell. I think there is still a sizable cushion at $590/ton HR (especially mini-mills), and they will continue to aggressively seek whatever volume they can muster. Normally, we don’t see the unique factors at play, as we have them now. It’s not normal to see your main ingredient (Iron) fall by 50% in a year, nor see the same for Oil/energy, especially in the same relative time range.
“The old adage “the only cure for low prices is low prices”, certainly applies now. Ironically, the mills would be better served by a more intense and quicker fall in prices, so that the imports quit getting booked. This will at least set the stage for a revival in the springtime. At the same time, they need to pull back production – now, if they hope to stem the fall in prices sooner vs. later. I think the market ought to forget using $600/ton HR as a sort of desired floor, a level which has been relative until now, based on the past input costs. We are in the midst of a mill cost re-set which will likely be sustained in 2015 and beyond.”
John Packard
Read more from John PackardLatest in Steel Mills
AISI outlines key issues for steel to Trump admin
The American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) has reached out to the Trump administration, as well as some members of Congress, to present a blueprint of issues that are top of mind for steel producers. “2025 presents an opportunity for the new administration and Congress to take a holistic look at the key issues impacting […]
Algoma to shut down line in Ontario ahead of EAF start
The 106” Mill was part of Algoma's plate and strip combination facility.
Nippon trial vs. US government to begin early next month: Report
Nippon Steel’s litigation against the US government is set to begin in early February, according to a report by Japan’s Kyodo News Agency. Nippon will file its opening brief on Feb. 3. And both parties will conclude their claims by March 17 in the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Kyodo […]
Nucor carbon targets certified by GSCC
Nucor’s “ambitious” carbon targets by the end of the decade and beyond have been certified by the Global Steel Climate Council (GSCC). The Charlotte, N.C.-based steelmaker used a base year of 2023 for its science-based emissions targets (SBET). It set an SBET of 0.975 metric tons (mt) of CO2 emissions per mt of hot-rolled steel […]
SSAB halts talks with Feds on Miss. green steel plant
The Department of Energy's Industrial Demonstrations Program page states that it is no longer moving forward with SSAB.