• Skip to main content

    Prices

    HR futures: Volatility, tariffs, and global shifts - What's next for prices in 2025?

    Written by Joshua Toney


    Import arbitrations expressed via futures may become enticing as coil price spreads expand. The spread market in CME US hot-rolled coil (HRC) is currently navigating a period of volatility. Prices have fluctuated post-election, leaving traders uncertain about the market’s direction. A Trump trade structure formed pre-election, with Jan. ’25 peaking at $790 per short ton (st) in early November before dropping to $730/st by month-end. The Dec. ’24/Jan. ’25 spread decomposed from a high of -$50/st to -$27/st by the end of November, and the spread stood at -$38/st as of Dec. 4. These sharp shifts highlight the market’s lack of clear direction, making it challenging for participants to find consistent opportunities.

    Dec. 4 – CME HRC Dec. ’24/Jan. ’25 Spread

    Source: Bloomberg

    Physical market participants are cautious and reluctant to increase inventory levels amidst uncertainty. While cash-and-carry trades remain viable due to the structure of CME HRC’s curve, the premium for forward sales is not sufficient to justify holding inventory. This is evident through the lack of deferred trading along the curve. For example, the Dec. ’24/Dec. ’25 price spread stood at -$105/st as of Dec. 4.

    Taking current Nucor consumer spot price (CSP) offer levels at $750/st against underlying indices for Midwest HRC of $671/st, we have an approximate $122/st spread for spot against December 2025 as of Dec. 4. This hesitation is contributing to a broader sense of uncertainty in the market.

    CME busheling futures

    Absent from HRC’s price action, CME BUS futures have been relatively rangebound, with buying pressure materializing on screen for 2025 expiries. The CME HRC vs. CME BUS spread has found stability at $350 per gross ton for the rolling month three expiry. As of Dec. 4 is Feb. ’25, this is just shy of the one-year mean of $360/gt.

    The launch of the CME Chicago Busheling (BUS) contract on Dec. 16 adds another layer of complexity. Declining participation in 2024 on the existing Midwest BUS contract is leading traders to anticipate a resurgence of BUS trading with the launch of the Chicago contract running in parallel for 2025. Expect to see enhanced liquidity and price discovery with the advent of this new contract.

    Dec. 4 CME HRC /CME BUS Rolling M3 Spread (Feb. ’25)

    Source Bloomberg

    Despite these challenges, there is optimism that tariffs and protectionist measures may provide a turning point. Expectations for 2025 suggest tariffs could play a key role in stabilizing or even boosting US HRC prices. Although Chinese production remains aggressive and experienced a 4% contraction in November 2024 steel PMI, new tariffs on steel imports to the US could create a more favorable environment for US mills. This could enable them to raise prices further. We would expect the scrap price side of the electric-arc furnace (EAF) equation to improve if mills are able to capitalize on strength from implied tariff structures.

    Additionally, the widening price spreads between US HRC and international markets could offer arbitrage opportunities. Futures markets in the global HRC sector could become more attractive as spreads expand. This could provide traders with avenues to capitalize on pricing shifts from Europe, the US, and Asia.

    The US HRC market is at a crossroads. Volatility continues to define price action. However, external factors like tariffs, arbitrage opportunities, and shifting scrap dynamics could offer significant upside. As 2025 approaches, all eyes will be on evolving trade policies, scrap supply conditions, and the performance of the new CME BUS contract. While the path forward remains uncertain, the market holds potential for recovery and growth.

    Joshua Toney

    Read more from Joshua Toney

    Latest in Prices

    Steel market chatter this week

    Steel market chatter this week Earlier this week, SMU polled steel buyers on an array of topics, ranging from market prices, demand, and inventories to tariffs, imports, and evolving market events. We are sharing a selection of the comments we received below, in each buyer’s own words. Before diving in, we reviewed all of the responses collected and compiled these key takeaways: • Most buyers continue to expect higher prices in the near future and report that demand is stable to improving. • Inventories are moving faster than they were this time last year for most respondents, attributed to limited availability and leaner supply chains. • Imports are attractive for many buyers on both price and availability, though quotas, long lead times, and quality concerns continue to limit their appeal. • Buyers were split on whether tariff policies are helping their businesses, while a slight majority reported some evidence of manufacturing reshoring, though many said it is still too early to tell. Want to share your thoughts? Contact david@steelmarketupdate.com to be included in our market questionnaires. How do you expect prices to trend over the next three months? “I expect prices to rise at a fairly rapid pace for at least the next two to three months because inventories will continue to decrease.” “Upward, capacity remains tight.” “Climbing for several months.” “Trending toward $1,300/st HRC, only because one small player is driving prices up with no one else selling spot.” “Higher, the Q1 bump is not showing in the futures market.” “We expect things to keep going up from here. Next year could get ugly, but we're not there yet.” “Still trending up. There are some soft spots getting softer, but still steady demand and a shortage of supply.” “Continue to rise slowly.” “Slow increases like they have been doing.” “Upward due to continued demand and mill maintenance outages.” “Will remain high but steady due to demand and tariff implications.” “Plate prices most likely will be flat to up over the next three months.” Is demand improving, declining or stable? “Demand is stable (if anything, overstated), with inventories so lean, late mill deliveries, and contract prices increasing next year.” “Demand is fairly consistent with the rest of the year.” “Stable, but very strong for our products.” “Stable as many projects are trying to get ahead of potential additional price increases.” “Stable due to the ‘slow season’ in our market.” “Plate demand is stable to improving.” “Demand is good to improving. We'll take it!” “Improving, but still not to 100% capacity.” Is inventory moving faster or slower than this time last year? “Faster... once it arrives (late), it goes right back out.” “Faster due to lack of availability and bullwhip buying.” “Inventory is moving faster this year than last because demand is stronger than last year and many of our competitors don't have as much steel to offer.” “Inventory is moving faster with supply chains so lean.” “Inventory is moving at a good clip. Just based on costs/spends, we're stocking less sheet, coil and plate though.” “Plate inventory is moving at a much faster pace year over year due to several factors.” “Faster due to a shortage of supply plus added demand.” “About the same.” Are President Trump's tariff policies helping your business? Buyers were split this week, with 44% believing the tariffs are helping their business and 44% saying they are not. The remaining 11% were unsure how the policies will impact them. Comments included: “Yes for now. Prices are very high, which causes people to buy before prices get higher.” “Yes, I credit Trump's policies and data centers for improving demand.” “Yes, inventory values continue to go up.” “They are helping on the sell side and hurting on the buy side.” “No, they are creating shortages and increasing the cost of steel.” Are you seeing evidence of manufacturing reshoring to the US because of Trump's tariffs? The slight majority of respondents (39%) reported they have seen some evidence of reshoring, a higher rate compared to recent surveys. A third said it is too early to say, and 28% answered they are not seeing any signs of reshoring. Comments included: “Yes. Perhaps reshoring has added to the increased demand in 2026.” “Yes, with machining and turning.” “Yes, capacity versus demand in North America is creating pressure to reshore products.” “Too early to say. There have been a lot of announcements, but steel availability has limited immediate moves.” Are imports more attractive than domestic material? “Imports are more attractive on a pricing front and an availability standpoint, but lead times are extended.” “Imports are attractive in both price and because they offer additional availability. Whether or not they show up and or as offered is another issue.” “Imports are certainly attractive. They're coming in in earnest, so this run will peter out early next year.” “Attractive due to price and availability.” “Attractive, domestic tons are unavailable.” “Yes on light gauge painted.” “Without quotas, yes, the price is more attractive. But if you get caught with the quota, pricing is very high.” “Not to us, but we are hearing more about affordable imports.” “Plate imports are only slightly more attractive than domestically produced plate.” “Not yet, shipping lag is still too large.” “No due to tariffs.” What's something that's going on in the market that nobody is talking about? “What is the latest on SDI/BlueScope? I had heard it was back on the ‘front burner’ but all is quiet now. Maybe that means a deal is getting close?” “Will the US bring a trade case against South Korea over imports spiking?” “Busheling scrap prices are flat, while hot roll continues to rise. The scrap gap is increasing.” “How will the next administration handle tariffs that have so limited our steel supply?” “Mill discipline in production capacity.” “Coke pricing levels due to demand and supply.” “Shipbuilding.”

    Plate supply squeeze tightens as demand presses higher

    The domestic plate market is showing few signs of relief for steel buyers. Lead times are stretching well beyond seasonal norms, spot availability has all but evaporated, and mills are drawing hard lines on contract volumes heading into 2027 negotiations. And the supply squeeze will likely intensify in a market that some industry sources say is structurally undersupplied because of stringent US trade and tariff policies. Imports have been arriving in larger volumes, and the expectation is they will continue to tick higher into 2027. The big question is whether those foreign tons will arrive in volumes sufficient to provide the relief steel consumers want.