Trade Cases
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8e17a/8e17ab4eb6b0fbd4fa2af4327e0e0e2b737ed795" alt=""
US bans steel made with forced labor from Baowu subsidiary
Written by Laura Miller
October 8, 2024
The US has banned imports from a subsidiary of the world’s largest steelmaker because it allegedly uses forced labor to produce steel products.
The US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has added Baowu Group Xinjiang Bayi Iron and Steel Co. (Xinjiang Bayi) to its Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) Entity List.
Xinjiang Bayi, which produces hot-rolled coil, plate, and rebar, is located in Ürümqi, Xinjiang, China. It was acquired by the Baosteel Group in 2007. When Baosteel merged with Wuhan Iron and Steel in 2016, it became China Baowu Steel Group. The group is now the largest steelmaker in the world, producing over 130 million metric tons in 2023.
The UFLPA, in place since December 2021, prohibits the importation of goods mined, produced, or manufactured wholly or in part with forced labor in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR) of the People’s Republic of China.
“The United States government has reasonable cause to believe, based on specific and articulable information, that Xinjiang Bayi works with the government of the XUAR to recruit, transport, transfer, harbor, or receive Uyghurs, Kazakhs, Kyrgyz, or members of other persecuted groups out of the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region,” DHS said in a statement on Oct. 2.
The UFLPA list now includes 75 entities, mainly in the chemicals, apparel/textiles, and agricultural sectors. Xinjiang Bayi is the first steel company added to it.
DHS cautioned US importers to conduct due diligence and research their supply chains to determine any risks of forced labor.
“No sector is off-limits,” warned DHS Under Secretary for Policy Robert Silvers.
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will deny entry to any goods or their components believed to be produced by these entities.
SMU received a tip earlier this year that a vessel carrying ~20,000 tons of Chinese tin plate was denied entry at a US port because it was unable to certify that the product was not made with forced labor. We were unable to confirm that rumor.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0a899/0a89916d3d8b21c3e15ac192acf47a440c18f98c" alt=""
Laura Miller
Read more from Laura MillerLatest in Trade Cases
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3a8a/d3a8a44458f8535cda37f74ca219e1e0e2ea9882" alt=""
Mills allege ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case vs. South Africa, UAE
"Recent activity in the marketplace strongly indicates that these imports are being rushed into the United States in an effort to avoid the imposition of antidumping duties," petitioners said.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd5cc/cd5ccf8fcd610d16dc861faee6fe045ca677cc79" alt=""
European Commission eyes retaliation vs. Trump steel tariffs: Report
The European Commission is looking into making current quotas on steel imports stricter as a countermeasure to President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the US, according to an article in Reuters.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1df9/c1df9ccee32d1383fa0b9bd73a6e14fd64318936" alt="The White House"
Trump could levy tariffs on auto imports in April: Report
President Donald Trump said last week that he could place tariffs on auto imports, according to an article in Politico.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4ede/c4ede29c075e98ef5ee69f321caea25835be56b8" alt=""
Section 232 tariffs are headed downstream
The Trump administration has revealed the list of derivative steel products being added to the Section 232 tariff list.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84bda/84bda1ccb5c0ca2fd6f7fcd8c2ca758876bf3bbb" alt=""
Leibowitz: In Trump’s brave new world of tariffs, what will stick and what will courts challenge?
With a chronic trade deficit, the administration will continue to cite more tariffs as necessary. This is in error, as noted above. Yet the base of President Trump’s support does not see it that way. More tariffs are possible. But the only way to reduce the US trade deficit substantially is to close the gap between savings and investment in the United States.