Trade Cases

US bans steel made with forced labor from Baowu subsidiary

Written by Laura Miller


The US has banned imports from a subsidiary of the world’s largest steelmaker because it allegedly uses forced labor to produce steel products.

The US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) has added Baowu Group Xinjiang Bayi Iron and Steel Co. (Xinjiang Bayi) to its Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act (UFLPA) Entity List.

Xinjiang Bayi, which produces hot-rolled coil, plate, and rebar, is located in Ürümqi, Xinjiang, China. It was acquired by the Baosteel Group in 2007. When Baosteel merged with Wuhan Iron and Steel in 2016, it became China Baowu Steel Group. The group is now the largest steelmaker in the world, producing over 130 million metric tons in 2023.

The UFLPA, in place since December 2021, prohibits the importation of goods mined, produced, or manufactured wholly or in part with forced labor in the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region (XUAR) of the People’s Republic of China.

“The United States government has reasonable cause to believe, based on specific and articulable information, that Xinjiang Bayi works with the government of the XUAR to recruit, transport, transfer, harbor, or receive Uyghurs, Kazakhs, Kyrgyz, or members of other persecuted groups out of the Xinjiang Uyghur Autonomous Region,” DHS said in a statement on Oct. 2.

The UFLPA list now includes 75 entities, mainly in the chemicals, apparel/textiles, and agricultural sectors. Xinjiang Bayi is the first steel company added to it.

DHS cautioned US importers to conduct due diligence and research their supply chains to determine any risks of forced labor.

“No sector is off-limits,” warned DHS Under Secretary for Policy Robert Silvers.

Customs and Border Protection (CBP) will deny entry to any goods or their components believed to be produced by these entities.

SMU received a tip earlier this year that a vessel carrying ~20,000 tons of Chinese tin plate was denied entry at a US port because it was unable to certify that the product was not made with forced labor. We were unable to confirm that rumor.

Laura Miller

Read more from Laura Miller

Latest in Trade Cases

Price on trade: The excess capacity threat moves closer to home

The Global Forum on Steel Excess Capacity (GFSEC) reaffirmed on Oct. 8 what domestic steel producers have long known—the threat of excess steel capacity never disappeared and is evolving. China’s steelmakers are boosting capacity and exports, echoing the 2016 global steel crisis. There is no doubt that China is successfully weaponizing excess capacity across many industries, and the fatal damage to domestic production and national security undermines the interests of all market-oriented countries. The question now is: How will GFSEC countries respond?