Trade Cases
US senators call for deadline on Mexican steel export monitoring agreement
Written by Ethan Bernard
December 14, 2023
A bipartisan group of US senators has written a letter requesting a clear deadline for an export monitoring agreement of Mexican steel products into the US market.
“The surge of Mexican steel imports into the US market” violates the 2019 Joint Statement by the United States and Mexico on Section 232 Duties on Steel and Aluminum, the senators say in their Dec. 13 letter to National Security Adviser Jake Sullivan.
The group applauds US Trade Ambassador Katherine Tai “for securing a commitment on Sept. 23, 2023, from Mexican Economic Minister Buenrostro to reinstate export monitoring to guarantee future compliance with the 2019 Joint Agreement.”
“However, we are concerned that the Mexican government is willfully delaying finalization of this agreement and is negotiating in bad faith,” the letter states.
Also, the group points out that Mexican President Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador has “drastically reduced the staff of Mexico’s Economy Ministry by at least a third, putting into question whether Mexico can even enforce an export monitoring agreement.”
Further, the group urges the Biden administration “to set a clear deadline for the implementation of an export monitoring agreement.”
“We ask for an update from your office by Dec. 31, 2023 on the administration’s next steps in driving these post-breach negotiations to conclusion,” the letter concludes.
The imports threaten the US manufacturing base and national security, according to the letter. The senators note data from 2022 that shows annual iron and steel imports from Mexico have increased by ~73% over the pre-Section 232 2015-17 baseline, as well as citing several Mexican steelmakers.
“This steel surge has already resulted in at least one plant closure, the loss of over a thousand new and existing jobs, and the deferment of millions of dollars in new investment,” the letter states.
“We request additional information on the administration’s plans to address this continued surge and urge you to take immediate action to safeguard US jobs and domestic steel manufacturing,” the letter says.
In September, SMU reported on Deputy USTR Jayme White’s meeting with a Mexican official regarding enhancing monitoring of Mexican steel and aluminum exports to the US.
A request for comment from Mexican steel association Canacero was not returned by time of publication.
Ethan Bernard
Read more from Ethan BernardLatest in Trade Cases
Mills allege ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case vs. South Africa, UAE
"Recent activity in the marketplace strongly indicates that these imports are being rushed into the United States in an effort to avoid the imposition of antidumping duties," petitioners said.
European Commission eyes retaliation vs. Trump steel tariffs: Report
The European Commission is looking into making current quotas on steel imports stricter as a countermeasure to President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the US, according to an article in Reuters.
Trump could levy tariffs on auto imports in April: Report
President Donald Trump said last week that he could place tariffs on auto imports, according to an article in Politico.
Section 232 tariffs are headed downstream
The Trump administration has revealed the list of derivative steel products being added to the Section 232 tariff list.
Leibowitz: In Trump’s brave new world of tariffs, what will stick and what will courts challenge?
With a chronic trade deficit, the administration will continue to cite more tariffs as necessary. This is in error, as noted above. Yet the base of President Trump’s support does not see it that way. More tariffs are possible. But the only way to reduce the US trade deficit substantially is to close the gap between savings and investment in the United States.