Steel Products
US Steel CEO Accuses Cliffs CEO of Refusing to Sign Sales NDA, But Leaves Door Open to Talks
Written by Michael Cowden
August 13, 2023
The spat between U.S. Steel and Cleveland-Cliffs over a proposed sale of the Pittsburgh-based steelmaker continued into Sunday evening.
U.S. Steel confirmed that it had received an unsolicited offer from its Cleveland-based competitor. It alleged that Cliffs had “refused to engage” in the customary processes for assessing valuation in a press release received by SMU at 7:01 pm ET on Aug. 13.
The company also, in an extraordinary move, disclosed the full text of a letter sent by U.S. Steel president and CEO David Burritt to his counterpart, Cliffs chairman, president and CEO Lourenco Goncalves.
U.S. Steel said it transmitted the letter from Burritt to Goncalves at 12:01 pm ET on Sunday afternoon, shortly before Cliffs publicly announced what had previously been a private discussion about a potential sale.
Burritt said in his letter to Goncalves that U.S. Steel and its advisors had on Aug. 7 offered to enter a non-disclosure (NDA) agreement with Cliffs about the proposed sale. The NDA would have allowed U.S. Steel and Cliffs to discuss not only valuation but also potential antitrust risks and the prospects of a combined company, Burritt said.
U.S. Steel was “shocked” to on Friday, Aug. 11., receive a letter from Cliffs “stating that you refused to sign the nearly completed NDA unless we agree to the economic terms of your proposal in advance.”
Cliffs said on Sunday afternoon that it had offered to buy U.S. Steel shares at $35 apiece, a hefty premium to their current price. It valued the deal at $10 billion.
But U.S. Steel did not confirm that figure. It said valuation and other details of the sale had not been worked out.
Pushing U.S. Steel and its board to agree to terms in advance of an NDA – and without customary due diligence – was “in essence a demand that it breach its fiduciary duties,” Burritt wrote.
“The Board has no choice but to reject your unreasonable offer,” he added.
But Burritt did not close the door to further talks, referring Goncalves to the formal sales review that U.S. Steel had made public earlier in the day.
“We invite you to reach out to our financial and legal representatives and welcome you to join our process,” he said.
Michael Cowden
Read more from Michael CowdenLatest in Steel Products
SMU Survey: Mill lead times contract slightly, remain short
Steel mill production times have seen very little change since September, according to buyers participating in our latest market survey.
Worthington Enterprises’ earnings dip in fiscal Q2’25
Worthington Enterprises' profits edged down in its fiscal second quarter of 205 vs. a year earlier. The company said a slump in sales in the quarter was due largely to the "deconsolidation" of the Sustainable Energy Solutions segment in the fourth quarter of fiscal 2024.
Final Thoughts
It's that time of year again. You know, that time when people wonder if those things are drones in New Jersey or if the aliens are ready to come onto the stage just in time for Inauguration Day. What will that do for steel price volatility? In any case, the SMU team finds itself in Pittsburgh this week.
November service center shipments and inventories report
Steel Market Update is pleased to share this Premium content with Executive members. For information on how to upgrade to a Premium-level subscription, contact info@steelmarketupdate.com. Flat rolled = 61.4 shipping days of supply Plate = 50.5 shipping days of supply Flat rolled Flat-rolled steel supply at US service centers remains seasonally high. November inventories edged down […]
STI sees jobs, tariffs, and commercial as top 2025 priorities
The Steel Tube Institute (STI) has outlined three priorities for 2025: skilled trade jobs, tariffs, and commercial building adaptations.