Trade Cases
Steel Caucus Urges Action on Mexican Imports
May 11, 2023
The Congressional Steel Caucus (CSC) has urged the US Department of Commerce and the US Trade Representative to take action to address what it calls a “surge of Mexican steel imports” into the US.
The CSC claims the imports are in violation of the US and Mexican 2019 Joint Statement on Section 232 Duties on Steel and Aluminum, according to a letter addressed to Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo and USTR Katherine Tai on Wednesday.
The US lifted 25% Section 232 duties on Mexican steel imports in May 2019, ahead of the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) going into effect in 2020.
“Over the past several months, members of the domestic steel industry and the United Steelworkers have brought to our attention the economic harm that this breach has caused on workers and our ability for steel to support our national economy and our national security,” the letter said.
The CSC said that total steel imports from Mexico rose by ~72% in 2022, with increases across major product lines, including rebar, hot-rolled, galvanized sheet, carbon and galvanized wire, wire rod, pipe and tube, steel conduit, semi-finished, and other products.
As an example, the letter claims that Mexican rebar imports were more than 3,000% greater by volume in 2022 than their 2015-2017 annual average.
“Additionally, the Mexican steel industry appears to be taking advantage of its status under the US-Mexico agreement to export to our nation steel that was produced in countries that remain subject to Section 232 measures,” the letter said.
The CSC stated that reports and data from the US Steel Import Monitoring and Analysis System show that significant volumes of steel melted and poured in countries such as Brazil, South Korea—and even Russia—have entered through Mexico to the US, duty free.
“The whole point of the agreement was to prevent the US from being a dumping ground for Mexican and global overcapacity that harms our producers, workers, and communities,” the letter said.
Finally, the letter states that “the Mexican refusal to honor the agreement has weakened the domestic industry, with production and capacity utilization down significantly this year.”
“Therefore, we urge you and the Biden administration to immediately begin consultations under the 2019 Agreement to address this surge of Mexican steel,” the CSC said. “If the Mexican government refuses to take swift action to remedy this matter, we strongly encourage the administration to consider other mechanisms to ensure compliance.”
The CSC is a bipartisan group that includes over 100 members of Congress from steel-producing communities.
In February, 13 US senators signed a letter to USTR and Commerce urging action on Mexican steel imports.
By Ethan Bernard, ethan@steelmarketupdate.com
Latest in Trade Cases
Mills allege ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case vs. South Africa, UAE
"Recent activity in the marketplace strongly indicates that these imports are being rushed into the United States in an effort to avoid the imposition of antidumping duties," petitioners said.
European Commission eyes retaliation vs. Trump steel tariffs: Report
The European Commission is looking into making current quotas on steel imports stricter as a countermeasure to President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the US, according to an article in Reuters.
Trump could levy tariffs on auto imports in April: Report
President Donald Trump said last week that he could place tariffs on auto imports, according to an article in Politico.
Section 232 tariffs are headed downstream
The Trump administration has revealed the list of derivative steel products being added to the Section 232 tariff list.
Leibowitz: In Trump’s brave new world of tariffs, what will stick and what will courts challenge?
With a chronic trade deficit, the administration will continue to cite more tariffs as necessary. This is in error, as noted above. Yet the base of President Trump’s support does not see it that way. More tariffs are possible. But the only way to reduce the US trade deficit substantially is to close the gap between savings and investment in the United States.