Trade Cases
Congressional Steel Caucus Urges More Action on Imports
March 1, 2023
The Congressional Steel Caucus (CSC) called on President Biden to keep Section 232 tariffs in place and to explore additional protections as well.
“We encourage the Biden administration to continue to maintain the Section 232 tariffs and quotas, ensure strong trade remedy laws that address unfair trade practices, and protect our environment from high-emission foreign steel production,” the CSC said to President Biden in a letter on Feb. 22.
The bipartisan congressional group urged updating US trade remedy laws “to reflect 21st-century challenges and establishing rules and standards for a resilient domestic steel industry.”
The caucus cited several key factors behind their recommendations. Among them were “government-supported overcapacity in global markets,” duty and tariff circumvention, geopolitical uncertainty, and supply chain risks that “threaten the erosion of the US manufacturing base.”
Additionally, the CSC lauded the US industry’s commitment to sustainable, low-carbon steel production. “However, these advancements are compromised every time a foreign government or producer seeks competitive advantage by cutting corners on sustainability,” the caucus added.
Philip K. Bell, president of the Steel Manufacturers Association, applauded the action taken by the caucus.
“We are proud to work with the Congressional Steel Caucus to encourage the Biden administration to maintain and enforce America’s trade laws as it encourages our trading partners to follow our roadmap for sustainable steel production,” he said in a statement provided to SMU.
Likewise, Kevin Dempsey, president and CEO of the American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI), supported the action.
“We are pleased and grateful that so many members of Congress have championed the American steel industry and our workers by supporting the preservation of the existing steel tariffs,” he said in a statement to SMU.
“We appreciate that the members of the Steel Caucus continue to recognize that the new investments American steelmakers are making, and our global leadership in clean steel production, would be at risk if the existing Section 232 program does not remain in place,” he added.
Dempsey said the group looks forward to continuing work with the caucus to combat “unfair trade” and the “global trade distortions” in steel that continue to threaten the industry.
By Ethan Bernard, ethan@steelmarketupdate.com
Latest in Trade Cases
Mills allege ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case vs. South Africa, UAE
"Recent activity in the marketplace strongly indicates that these imports are being rushed into the United States in an effort to avoid the imposition of antidumping duties," petitioners said.
European Commission eyes retaliation vs. Trump steel tariffs: Report
The European Commission is looking into making current quotas on steel imports stricter as a countermeasure to President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the US, according to an article in Reuters.
Trump could levy tariffs on auto imports in April: Report
President Donald Trump said last week that he could place tariffs on auto imports, according to an article in Politico.
Section 232 tariffs are headed downstream
The Trump administration has revealed the list of derivative steel products being added to the Section 232 tariff list.
Leibowitz: In Trump’s brave new world of tariffs, what will stick and what will courts challenge?
With a chronic trade deficit, the administration will continue to cite more tariffs as necessary. This is in error, as noted above. Yet the base of President Trump’s support does not see it that way. More tariffs are possible. But the only way to reduce the US trade deficit substantially is to close the gap between savings and investment in the United States.