Trade Cases

Scrap Prices Rise in December, Higher Expectations for January

Written by Brett Linton


Ferrous scrap prices increased from November to December, according to Steel Market Update sources, breaking the seven-month cycle of price declines. Buyers reported prime scrap prices increased roughly $30 per gross ton, while shredded prices rose $20 per ton.

steel scrap“Scrap prices are up a minimum $20-30 per ton this month,” reported one scrap executive. He noted that there are quiet deals being done at higher prices, and southern dealers are “insisting on a $30 per ton increase on shredded and HMS”.

Our scrap prices for November are as follows:

• Busheling at $360–400 per gross ton, averaging $380, up $35 from last month
• Shredded at $380–400 per gross ton, averaging $390, up $20 from last month
• HMS at $300–330 per gross ton, averaging $315, up $10 from last month

Buyers expect prices to continue to rise into January due to supply limitations. “Dealers do not have very much inventory, and with winter and the holidays upon us, no way to improve the flows,” said one source. “If you had scrap, you’d be hesitant to sell now at these prices.”

Another source remarked, “Farther down the scrap food chain shredders are already raising feedstock prices $35-50 per ton.” He added that busheling could increase an additional $50 per ton in January. 

SMU polled steel buyers earlier this week, asking what their expectations were for December scrap prices. Over half expected prices to remain stable, similar to mid-November expectations. Only 32% of those responding expected prices to increase, compared to 10% two weeks prior. 

PSA: SMU members can chart various scrap prices as far back as 2007 using our interactive pricing tool.

By Brett Linton, Brett@SteelMarketUpdate.com

Brett Linton

Read more from Brett Linton

Latest in Trade Cases

Price: Should billions in Section 232 revenue go to foreign manufacturers or to the American people?

Do we want the benefits of the Section 232 tariffs to flow to the bottom lines of foreign steel and aluminum producers or to the US government and, ultimately, domestic manufacturers and their workers? In our view, the answer is simple. Section 232 exceptions do nothing more than lead to underserved profits for foreign manufacturers who are harming the US industrial base. That revenue could be used to pursue the Trump administration’s other policy priorities - such as deficit reduction or expanded tax cuts.