Trade Cases

Commerce Revokes Russia’s Market Economy Status

Written by Laura Miller


The US Department of Commerce said on Thursday that it would no longer consider Russia a market economy in antidumping cases.

The move could allow for higher duties on Russian imports in trade cases going forward.

An analysis done by third parties for Commerce found that Russia’s government has had considerable involvement in its economy, which Commerce said has led to “distorted prices and costs in Russia which do not accurately reflect whether Russian companies are fairly pricing imports into the US.”

Criteria considered in determining whether a country is a market or non-market economy include: currency convertibility, how wages are determined, the foreign investment climate, how the government controls production, and governmental control over business decisions. Commerce found significant interference in these areas by the Russian government, particularly since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine earlier this year.

Now considering Russia a non-market economy (NME), Commerce will now apply a different methodology to calculate its AD duties than the one currently used for market economies. It will use market-based prices and costs from a country at a similar level of economic development and that produces similar merchandise.

“This decision is an important acknowledgement of the rise of Russian state-influence in their economy, which puts US industries at a disadvantage when trying to complete globally,” Commerce stated.

Trade attorney Lewis Leibowitz told SMU: “There is a chance the Russian imports will be hit with much higher dumping margins and fairly soon” as a result of Commerce’s decision.

In the most recent steel trade case decision involving Russia — the case against OCTG imports — weighted-average dumping margins were set at 12.84% and 184.21% for certain Russian companies. Should an interested party in this case, or any other antidumping case involving Russia, request a changed circumstance review, Russia’s NME status will be considered and dumping margins likely increased.

The American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) responded favorably to the news, with AISI president and CEO Kevin Dempsey telling SMU: “We are pleased that the Commerce Department has recognized that extensive Russian government involvement in its economy distorts costs and prices throughout the Russian economy. Today’s decision will give the Commerce Department access to additional enforcement tools and will allow it to more effectively address Russian unfair trade practices that injure American industries.”

By Laura Miller, Laura@SteelMarketUpdate.com

Laura Miller

Read more from Laura Miller

Latest in Trade Cases

Leibowitz: Trump 2.0 signals Cold War 2.0 trade and China policies

China is one of the elephants in the room as the transition to Trump 2.0 continues. While the people and policies are still being formulated, it’s possible to detect a strategy for the new Trump administration. I think there are two imperative issues that the new administration needs to balance. The Trump strategy will, I believe, follow the following points. First, trade is one of the issues that got President Trump elected in 2016 and 2024—it nearly got him elected in 2020, save for the pandemic. If President Trump had won in 2020, I might be writing chronicles about the end of his eight years in the White House now instead of projecting what the next Trump administration would accomplish or break. Oh, well—that’s life. Trade will necessarily be a key feature of relations with China for the next four years.