Trade Cases
Commerce Revokes Russia’s Market Economy Status
Written by Laura Miller
November 10, 2022
The US Department of Commerce said on Thursday that it would no longer consider Russia a market economy in antidumping cases.
The move could allow for higher duties on Russian imports in trade cases going forward.
An analysis done by third parties for Commerce found that Russia’s government has had considerable involvement in its economy, which Commerce said has led to “distorted prices and costs in Russia which do not accurately reflect whether Russian companies are fairly pricing imports into the US.”
Criteria considered in determining whether a country is a market or non-market economy include: currency convertibility, how wages are determined, the foreign investment climate, how the government controls production, and governmental control over business decisions. Commerce found significant interference in these areas by the Russian government, particularly since Russia’s invasion of Ukraine earlier this year.
Now considering Russia a non-market economy (NME), Commerce will now apply a different methodology to calculate its AD duties than the one currently used for market economies. It will use market-based prices and costs from a country at a similar level of economic development and that produces similar merchandise.
“This decision is an important acknowledgement of the rise of Russian state-influence in their economy, which puts US industries at a disadvantage when trying to complete globally,” Commerce stated.
Trade attorney Lewis Leibowitz told SMU: “There is a chance the Russian imports will be hit with much higher dumping margins and fairly soon” as a result of Commerce’s decision.
In the most recent steel trade case decision involving Russia — the case against OCTG imports — weighted-average dumping margins were set at 12.84% and 184.21% for certain Russian companies. Should an interested party in this case, or any other antidumping case involving Russia, request a changed circumstance review, Russia’s NME status will be considered and dumping margins likely increased.
The American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) responded favorably to the news, with AISI president and CEO Kevin Dempsey telling SMU: “We are pleased that the Commerce Department has recognized that extensive Russian government involvement in its economy distorts costs and prices throughout the Russian economy. Today’s decision will give the Commerce Department access to additional enforcement tools and will allow it to more effectively address Russian unfair trade practices that injure American industries.”
By Laura Miller, Laura@SteelMarketUpdate.com
Laura Miller
Read more from Laura MillerLatest in Trade Cases
Trump threatens 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico as soon as Feb. 1
President Donald Trump said on Monday evening that he was considering placing tariffs of 25% on imports from Canada and Mexico. The president said the tariffs could go into effect as soon as Feb. 1. President Trump threatened the tariffs as he signed a raft of executive orders in front of reporters in the Oval […]
Leibowitz: Trump will act fast on tariffs and immigration – buckle up
The new president clearly likes tariffs, and he wants to use them to make the United States more competitive - especially in manufacturing and mining. I believe that this will not be effective. But tariffs are very likely to be announced among the early pronouncements.
Canacero disputes US allegations of Mexican steel export threat
Mexican steel trade association Canacero said steel exports from the Latin American country into the US do not pose a threat. And claims that Mexican steel exports have been the driver of US plant closures and layoffs are “unfounded,” the association said. “On the contrary, the US greatly benefits from steel trade flows and has […]
Coated steel trade case update: Postponements and new allegations
The steel industry may have to wait even longer for the initial duty determinations in the pending coated steel unfair trade investigations.
Price on Trade: Next six months will set course of trade for years to come
This may be the most consequential six months for trade policy in recent memory. The wait to see what form Trump's actions take is almost over.