Trade Cases
Commerce Finalizes AD/CVD Rates in OCTG Trade Case
Written by Laura Miller
September 29, 2022
The US Department of Commerce has issued its final determinations in the trade case investigating the dumping of OCTG imports from Mexico, Argentina, and Russia, and the subsidization of OCTG from Russia and South Korea. The investigations include both welded and seamless OCTG.
Antidumping Case
In the final results of the case investigating Mexico, Commerce found that imports from the country are being sold in the US at less than fair value, setting final weighted-average dumping margins of 44.93% for mandatory respondent Tubos de Acero de Mexico and for all other Mexican companies. Additionally, Commerce found that critical circumstances exist in the case. Critical circumstances mean that exporters were flooding the market during the trade investigation. To offset the import surges, the affirmative finding allows the duties to now be applied retroactively 90 days before they were actually imposed, which in these cases was May 11.
Commerce determined that OCTG imports from Argentina are also being sold at less than fair value, but found that critical circumstances do not exist in that case. Final dumping margins were set at 78.3% for Siderca and all other Argentinean companies.
OCTG imports from Russia are also being sold at less than fair value, Commerce found, noting that critical circumstances exist only for certain Russian companies. Dumping margins were set at 12.84% for JSC Vyksa Steel Works and for the all-others rate. A handful of companies (see chart below) had rates set at 184.21%.
The periods of review in the antidumping cases were Oct. 1, 2020 through Sept. 30, 2021.
Countervailing Duty Case
Commerce also found that OCTG producers and exporters in Russia are being provided countervailable subsidies, setting subsidy rates at 1.30% for Volzxhsky Pipe Plant, Sinarsky Pipe Plant, Seversky Pipe Plant, Taganrog Metallurgical Plant, Orsky Machine Building Plant, and PAO TMK. JSC Vyksa Steel Works’ rate was set at 1.59% and the all-others rate was found to be 1.43%. Critical circumstances were not found to be present in this case.
South Korean OCTG producers and exporters were also found to be receiving countervailable subsidies. CVD rates were set at 0.25 de minimis for Hyundai Steel, 1.33% for SeAH Steel, and 1.33% for all others. De minimis rates below 0.5% mean duties will not be collected on those imports. Critical circumstances were not alleged and thus not found in this case.
In the CVD cases, the periods of review were the 2020 calendar year.
Final Results
As a result of Commerce’s determinations, AD and CVD duties will now be collected by US Customs and Border Control on OCTG imports from these countries at the rates set above. The final rates differ somewhat from the preliminary rates determined by Commerce earlier this year.
The US International Trade Commission will make the final injury determinations for its portion of these cases. If injury is taking place or threatening to take place to the domestic industry, these ADs and CVDs will be officially put in place for the next five years. If negative injury determinations are made by the ITC, the cases will be terminated completely and duties will not be applied.
The OCTG market in the US is a major consumer of flat-rolled steel and plate. The market has been undersupplied for some time now, resulting in high prices and extended lead times, and this is expected to continue for the foreseeable future.
By Laura Miller, Laura@SteelMarketUpdate.com
Laura Miller
Read more from Laura MillerLatest in Trade Cases
CRU: Turkey imposes tariffs on steel imports; Malaysia launches AD probe
Ankara has placed anti-dumping duties of ranging from 6.10% to 43.31% on hot-rolled steel sheet from China, India, Japan, and Russia. Meanwhile, Malaysia has announced it will investigate allegedly dumped steel wire rod from China, Indonesia, and Vietnam.
Price on trade: The excess capacity threat moves closer to home
The Global Forum on Steel Excess Capacity (GFSEC) reaffirmed on Oct. 8 what domestic steel producers have long known—the threat of excess steel capacity never disappeared and is evolving. China’s steelmakers are boosting capacity and exports, echoing the 2016 global steel crisis. There is no doubt that China is successfully weaponizing excess capacity across many industries, and the fatal damage to domestic production and national security undermines the interests of all market-oriented countries. The question now is: How will GFSEC countries respond?
US bans steel made with forced labor from Baowu subsidiary
The US has banned imports from a subsidiary of the world’s largest steelmaker because it is allegedly using forced labor to produce steel products.
China challenges Canada’s tariffs on steel, aluminum, EVs
China is challenging Canada’s decision to put tariffs on imports of Chinese steel, aluminum, and electric vehicles.
Leibowitz: Harris, Trump don’t talk much about steel and trade – because they (mostly) agree
By most accounts, the issues that are most important for voters in this election are the economy, immigration, and abortion. International trade policy plays a key role in at least two of those three (the economy and immigration). Both presidential candidates recognize that trade and tariffs are an important focus. And “America first” is a rallying point for both candidates.