Trade Cases
US Sets High Dumping Margins on OCTG from Three Countries
Written by Laura Miller
May 12, 2022
The US Department of Commerce has made affirmative preliminary determinations in the trade case investigating the dumping of OCTG by Argentina, Mexico, and Russia.
High dumping margins were set for most producers and exporters from the three countries, which could slow down OCTG imports further in an already undersupplied market.
Critical circumstances were found to exist in the cases against Argentina and Mexico but not in the Russian case. Critical circumstances allow for duties to be applied retroactively for 90 days before the imposition of the provisional measures, which began on May 11. The period of investigation for these cases is October 1, 2020 through September 30, 2021.
In the Argentinian case, Commerce set preliminary weighted-average dumping margins of 76.43% for Siderca SAIC and the same margin for all other Argentinian companies.
In the case against Mexico, a 69.56% preliminary dumping margin was set on imports from Tubos de Acero de Mexico (TAMSA), and the same rate was applied to all-other Mexican producers and exporters.
Preliminary margins in the Russian case were set at 11.35% for JSC Vyksa Steel Works, 121.11% for a handful of pipe plants, and 70.49% for the all-others rate.
Commerce has decided to postpone making its final determinations in these cases, setting a new deadline of September 23.
During the one-year period of review, OCTG imports from Argentina were 119,060 net tons, from Mexico 264,809 tons, and from Russia 100,610 tons, according to data from the US International Trade Commission. In the first three months of this year, imports reached 44,533 tons from Argentina, 85,130 tons from Mexico, and 61,712 tons from Russia. The subject merchandise may also enter under additional HTSUS codes, so actual figures may be higher.
In the first three months of 2022, the largest foreign suppliers of OCTG to the US in descending order were South Korea, Mexico, Russia, Argentina, Austria, Taiwan, Canada, Ukraine, and Brazil. According to licensing data, no product was imported from Russia or Ukraine during all of April and or the beginning of May.
A countervailing duty case is also currently pending on allegedly subsidized OCTG imports from Russia and South Korea. Both the countervailing and antidumping cases include both seamless and welded product.
The OCTG market in the US, which is a major consumer of flat-rolled steel and plate, has been undersupplied now for some time, plagued by high prices and lead times extended out for several quarters. The high margins found in these trade cases could slow imports from these countries, or increase prices further for imported product. Either way, elevated OCTG prices are expected to continue in the US for the foreseeable future.
By Laura Miller, Laura@SteelMarketUpdate.com
Laura Miller
Read more from Laura MillerLatest in Trade Cases
Mills allege ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case vs. South Africa, UAE
"Recent activity in the marketplace strongly indicates that these imports are being rushed into the United States in an effort to avoid the imposition of antidumping duties," petitioners said.
European Commission eyes retaliation vs. Trump steel tariffs: Report
The European Commission is looking into making current quotas on steel imports stricter as a countermeasure to President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the US, according to an article in Reuters.
Trump could levy tariffs on auto imports in April: Report
President Donald Trump said last week that he could place tariffs on auto imports, according to an article in Politico.
Section 232 tariffs are headed downstream
The Trump administration has revealed the list of derivative steel products being added to the Section 232 tariff list.
Leibowitz: In Trump’s brave new world of tariffs, what will stick and what will courts challenge?
With a chronic trade deficit, the administration will continue to cite more tariffs as necessary. This is in error, as noted above. Yet the base of President Trump’s support does not see it that way. More tariffs are possible. But the only way to reduce the US trade deficit substantially is to close the gap between savings and investment in the United States.