Trade Cases

U.S., Japan Begin Talks to Soften Section 232 Tariffs

Written by Michael Cowden


The U.S. and Japan have officially begun talks that could lead to an easing of Section 232 tariffs on Japanese steel and aluminum exports.

Those negotiations are part of a broader bilateral discussion on ways to reduce excess steel- and aluminum-making capacity globally, most of which the U.S. says is driven by China.

Japan“The United States and Japan will seek to resolve bilateral concerns in this area, including the application of Section 232 measures,” the Commerce Department and the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative said in a joint statement

The negotiations come after Japanese Trade Minister Hagiuda sought a “resolution” to Section 232 during a virtual meeting with USTR Katherine Tai earlier this month. Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo is also involved in the discussions.

The talks also come after the U.S and the European Union agreed to a tariff-rate quota, or TRQ, to replace Section 232 tariffs on the trade bloc in late October.

The statement from USTR and Commerce did not specify whether a TRQ was being discussed with Japan as well. But it made clear that the U.S. wants Japan’s support in countering “global nonmarket excess capacity driven largely by China,” which Commerce and USTR said pose a “serious threat” to domestic steel and aluminum producers.

“The United States and Japan have a historic alliance, built on mutual trust and respect, and reflecting shared values and a strong commitment to resolving global challenges through closer cooperation,” USTR and Commerce said.

“The two countries accordingly share similar national security interests as democratic, market economies,” the agencies said.

Section 232 tariffs – 25% on foreign steel and 10% on foreign aluminum – where implemented in 2018 by the Trump administration on national security grounds. That irritated traditional U.S. allies such as Japan and the EU, which strenuously disagreed with the idea that their steel and aluminum threatened U.S. national interests.

Other U.S. allies such as the UK, which is subject to the 25% tariff, and South Korea, which is subject to a hard quota, are also seeking an easing of Section 232 restrictions on their exports to the U.S.

By Michael Cowden, Michael@SteelMarketUpdate.com

Michael Cowden

Read more from Michael Cowden

Latest in Trade Cases

Leibowitz: The consequences of a new barrage of trade cases on coated steel

Domestic steel producers and the United Steelworkers (USW) union filed a barrage of trade cases last week. This is hardly news. Ever since the Commerce Department ruled that Vietnam is still treated as a nonmarket economy (NME) for antidumping purposes, many in the business expected new cases on the product that Vietnam excels at—“corrosion-resistant steel.” Nor is it a surprise that these cases roped in nine countries in addition to Vietnam: Australia, Brazil, Canada, Mexico, the Netherlands, South Africa, Taiwan, Turkey, and the United Arab Emirates. All these countries rank in the top ten exporters of corrosion-resistant steel to the United States. These petitions are a broadside against coated flat-rolled steel imports.

US mills file sprawling trade case against coated imports from 10 nations

US mills have filed or soon will file a sprawling trade petition against imports of coated flat-rolled steel from 10 countries. The petition seeks anti-dumping margins against Canada, Mexico, Brazil, the Netherlands, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates, Vietnam, Taiwan, Australia, and South Africa. It also seeks countervailing duty margins against Canada, Mexico, Brazil, and Vietnam. That’s according documents dated Sept. 5 and addressed to Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo and International Trade Commission (ITC) Secretary Lisa Barton.

Steel Summit 2024: Trade issues abound ahead of election

Trade is always front and center in an election year. And 2024 is no different. There is no shortage of issues, with questions like the sale of U.S. Steel to Japan’s Nippon Steel, potential cracks in the USMCA, and Chinese overcapacity dominating the headlines. But how do you distinguish between issues that might just last until November, and what are the crucial questions that could affect your business for years to come?