Trade Cases
EU-U.S. Target Nov. 1 for Section 232 Accord: EU Official
Written by Michael Cowden
August 3, 2021
The United States and the European Union aim to resolve their differences around Section 232 tariffs on the EU by Nov. 1, an EU official said.
“On the U.S. Section 232, both sides confirmed readiness to find a solution by 1 November,” the EU official told Steel Market Update (SMU).
“In terms of progress, both sides agreed to move forward with some concrete solutions in line with key parameters, such as restoring historic trade flows and to have a WTO-compliant system in order to avoid managed trade,” the official said.
The U.S. Commerce Department and the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) did not respond to requests for comment for this article.
The White House confirmed in June that the U.S. and EU were seeking to resolve “existing differences” on Section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminum by the end of the year.
Section 232 tariffs, 25% in the case of steel and 10% in the case of aluminum, were rolled out by the administration of former President Donald Trump in 2018. The action came as a surprise at the time because the national security tariffs were applied to traditional U.S. allies such as the EU.
Steel consumers in general oppose Section 232. But the national security tariffs and quotas have been popular with U.S. mills and the United Steelworkers (USW) union.
The American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI), a lobbying group for U.S. mills, has said that U.S.-EU talks to resolve their differences over Section 232 don’t necessarily mean the national security tariffs will be lifted anytime soon.
And Cleveland-Cliffs President and CEO Lourenco Goncalves said during CRU’s Steel Decarbonization Strategies 2021 Virtual Conference earlier this summer that Section 232 tariffs could be replaced by a carbon border adjustment process.
“Section 232 was never supposed to be a permanent solution,” said Goncalves. “It was a stop-gap measure that played a very important role. Massive investments have been deployed in the U.S. due to Section 232. … It served its purpose.”
Goncalves stressed at the time that any such mechanism would have to account for Scope 1, Scope 2 and Scope 3 emissions.
Scope 1 refers to emissions generated directly by a producer such as a steel mill. Scope 2 refers to emissions related to the energy that powers that company. And scope 3 includes other emissions associated with a mill’s manufacturing process—such as emissions embedded in imported pig iron.
Section 232 tariffs have contributed in part to U.S. steel prices being the highest in the world. The price difference between domestic steel and that produced abroad has ballooned to its widest point ever.
By Michael Cowden, Michael@SteelMarketUpdate.com
Michael Cowden
Read more from Michael CowdenLatest in Trade Cases
CRU: Turkey imposes tariffs on steel imports; Malaysia launches AD probe
Ankara has placed anti-dumping duties of ranging from 6.10% to 43.31% on hot-rolled steel sheet from China, India, Japan, and Russia. Meanwhile, Malaysia has announced it will investigate allegedly dumped steel wire rod from China, Indonesia, and Vietnam.
Price on trade: The excess capacity threat moves closer to home
The Global Forum on Steel Excess Capacity (GFSEC) reaffirmed on Oct. 8 what domestic steel producers have long known—the threat of excess steel capacity never disappeared and is evolving. China’s steelmakers are boosting capacity and exports, echoing the 2016 global steel crisis. There is no doubt that China is successfully weaponizing excess capacity across many industries, and the fatal damage to domestic production and national security undermines the interests of all market-oriented countries. The question now is: How will GFSEC countries respond?
US bans steel made with forced labor from Baowu subsidiary
The US has banned imports from a subsidiary of the world’s largest steelmaker because it is allegedly using forced labor to produce steel products.
China challenges Canada’s tariffs on steel, aluminum, EVs
China is challenging Canada’s decision to put tariffs on imports of Chinese steel, aluminum, and electric vehicles.
Leibowitz: Harris, Trump don’t talk much about steel and trade – because they (mostly) agree
By most accounts, the issues that are most important for voters in this election are the economy, immigration, and abortion. International trade policy plays a key role in at least two of those three (the economy and immigration). Both presidential candidates recognize that trade and tariffs are an important focus. And “America first” is a rallying point for both candidates.