Trade Cases
Tariff Reform Coalition: Time to Roll Back Section 232
Written by Tim Triplett
March 26, 2021
It’s time to roll back the Section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, and the Section 301 tariffs on imports from China, which are inflicting significant harm on U.S. businesses and workers, argued the National Foreign Trade Council on Wednesday in an appeal to the Biden administration. The NFTC’s briefing paper, “Why Recent Tariff Increases Harm Our Economy,” was signed by the Tariff Reform Coalition, a group of 37 manufacturing and agricultural trade groups in an appeal to President Biden to reconsider the high Trump-era tariffs.
Comments from Biden administration officials have been generally supportive of the tariffs and the American jobs they protect, but have not stated definitively if they will support the trade actions long term.
Opponents argue that the tariffs, and the retaliation they prompt by foreign governments, puts U.S. manufacturers, distributors and farmers at a disadvantage to foreign competitors and threaten far more jobs than they protect, at a time when American businesses are already struggling with the economic downturn caused by COVID-19.
“As American businesses and workers struggle with the effects of the pandemic, this is the worst possible time to turn inward and continue maintaining high trade barriers, including Section 232 and Section 301 tariffs,” the group wrote in its appeal. “The Section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminum should be removed as soon as possible. There are ample authorities under other trade laws, recognized as legitimate under WTO agreements if properly applied, to address problems of steel and aluminum subsidies or global overcapacity in a way that would minimize adverse impacts on the majority of U.S. companies and workers.”
Emotions are strong on both sides of the issue, with steel industry trade groups adamantly urging the administration to stay the course on Section 232, despite the record high steel prices in the U.S. The American Iron and Steel Institute and the Steel Manufacturers Association, declared their support this week of a new study by the Economic Policy Institute that found the Section 232 tariffs put in place in 2018 have been effective in countering trade-distorting practices by China and other nations and should be kept in place until a permanent solution to the chronic problem of excess global steel production capacity is achieved.
Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Trade Cases
Price on Trade: The foolishness of free trade with controlled economies
It was only a matter of time before a shutdown happened. And, no, we aren’t talking about the federal government’s lapse in appropriations. On Oct. 9, Beijing announced a series of restrictions that will effectively shut down exports of rare earth elements, magnets, and certain downstream products vital to advanced manufacturing.
Trump pulls plug on trade talks with Canada after anti-tariff Reagan ad
US President Donald Trump took to social media late Thursday night to announce he was canceling trade talks with Canada.
Leibowitz: Renewed trade war with China over rare earths
On Oct.10, President Trump announced major increases in tariffs on Chinese goods. The trigger was a new regime of export controls on rare earth metals and products using those elements, including magnets, capital equipment, and catalysts for catalytic converters in cars and trucks.
Industry piles on new Section 232 steel derivative inclusion requests
The Department of Commerce received 97 submissions from producers, manufacturers, and groups seeking Section 232 tariff coverage for steel and aluminum derivative products.
Price on Trade: New EU steel tariffs don’t mean the US should weaken its stance
Any steel imports into the EU that exceed the new, lower quota level would be subject to a 50% tariff, which represents a major increase from the EU’s current 25% out-of-quota tariff. This move would largely align the EU’s steel tariff rate with Canada and the United States.