Trade Cases
Tariff Reform Coalition: Time to Roll Back Section 232
Written by Tim Triplett
March 26, 2021
It’s time to roll back the Section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminum imports, and the Section 301 tariffs on imports from China, which are inflicting significant harm on U.S. businesses and workers, argued the National Foreign Trade Council on Wednesday in an appeal to the Biden administration. The NFTC’s briefing paper, “Why Recent Tariff Increases Harm Our Economy,” was signed by the Tariff Reform Coalition, a group of 37 manufacturing and agricultural trade groups in an appeal to President Biden to reconsider the high Trump-era tariffs.
Comments from Biden administration officials have been generally supportive of the tariffs and the American jobs they protect, but have not stated definitively if they will support the trade actions long term.
Opponents argue that the tariffs, and the retaliation they prompt by foreign governments, puts U.S. manufacturers, distributors and farmers at a disadvantage to foreign competitors and threaten far more jobs than they protect, at a time when American businesses are already struggling with the economic downturn caused by COVID-19.
“As American businesses and workers struggle with the effects of the pandemic, this is the worst possible time to turn inward and continue maintaining high trade barriers, including Section 232 and Section 301 tariffs,” the group wrote in its appeal. “The Section 232 tariffs on steel and aluminum should be removed as soon as possible. There are ample authorities under other trade laws, recognized as legitimate under WTO agreements if properly applied, to address problems of steel and aluminum subsidies or global overcapacity in a way that would minimize adverse impacts on the majority of U.S. companies and workers.”
Emotions are strong on both sides of the issue, with steel industry trade groups adamantly urging the administration to stay the course on Section 232, despite the record high steel prices in the U.S. The American Iron and Steel Institute and the Steel Manufacturers Association, declared their support this week of a new study by the Economic Policy Institute that found the Section 232 tariffs put in place in 2018 have been effective in countering trade-distorting practices by China and other nations and should be kept in place until a permanent solution to the chronic problem of excess global steel production capacity is achieved.
Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Trade Cases
Mills allege ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case vs. South Africa, UAE
"Recent activity in the marketplace strongly indicates that these imports are being rushed into the United States in an effort to avoid the imposition of antidumping duties," petitioners said.
European Commission eyes retaliation vs. Trump steel tariffs: Report
The European Commission is looking into making current quotas on steel imports stricter as a countermeasure to President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the US, according to an article in Reuters.
Trump could levy tariffs on auto imports in April: Report
President Donald Trump said last week that he could place tariffs on auto imports, according to an article in Politico.
Section 232 tariffs are headed downstream
The Trump administration has revealed the list of derivative steel products being added to the Section 232 tariff list.
Leibowitz: In Trump’s brave new world of tariffs, what will stick and what will courts challenge?
With a chronic trade deficit, the administration will continue to cite more tariffs as necessary. This is in error, as noted above. Yet the base of President Trump’s support does not see it that way. More tariffs are possible. But the only way to reduce the US trade deficit substantially is to close the gap between savings and investment in the United States.