Trade Cases
USTR Nominee Tai Touts Section 232, USMCA
Written by Michael Cowden
February 26, 2021
U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) nominee Katherine Tai expressed support for Section 232 tariffs on imported steel and aluminum, characterizing the duties as a “legitimate tool in the trade toolbox.”
The prospective top U.S. trade negotiator also signaled that the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) – the replacement to the North American Free Trade Agreement (Nafta) – would be enforced vigorously by the Biden administration.
Both trade actions were important achievements for the administration of former President Donald Trump.
“With respect to the 232 tariffs on steel and aluminum. … We have to acknowledge that we have overall a very significant global marketplace problem in the steel and aluminum markets that are driven primarily by China’s overcapacity,” Tai said. “But it’s not just a China problem.”
Tai made the comment during a Senate confirmation hearing earlier in the week. Her words echoed the position of the United Steelworkers union, domestic steelmakers and lobbying groups for them, which have assailed what they see as excess steel production capability not only in China but also in emerging markets in Southeast Asia, India and Turkey.
While expressing support for tariffs, Tai also said the U.S. would need to work to rebuild international alliances, rejoin international institutions and build a “united front” with its allies on trade issues.
The comments appeared to reference the Trump administration’s spurning of international groups such as the World Trade Organization and its unilateral approach to trade relations with China.
“China is simultaneously a rival, a trade partner and an outsized player whose cooperation we’ll also need to address certain global challenges” such as climate change, Tai said. “We must remember how to walk, chew gum and play chess at the same time.”
Closer to home, Tai said it was important to protect and enforce bi-partisan trade deals such as USMCA.
“Too often in the past, Congress and the administration came together to finalize and pass a trade agreement. But then other urgent matters arose and we all moved on,” Tai said “The United States-Mexico-Canada agreement is a uniquely bipartisan accomplishment that must break that trend. …. We must all continue to prioritize its implementation and success.”
Domestic steel interests have hailed USMCA for policies such as more stringent domestic content requirements. The successful negotiation of the trade pact led to Section 232 tariffs being lifted from Canada and Mexico in 2019.
By Michael Cowden, Michael@SteelMarketUpdate.com
Michael Cowden
Read more from Michael CowdenLatest in Trade Cases
Trump threatens 25% tariffs on Canada and Mexico as soon as Feb. 1
President Donald Trump said on Monday evening that he was considering placing tariffs of 25% on imports from Canada and Mexico. The president said the tariffs could go into effect as soon as Feb. 1. President Trump threatened the tariffs as he signed a raft of executive orders in front of reporters in the Oval […]
Leibowitz: Trump will act fast on tariffs and immigration – buckle up
The new president clearly likes tariffs, and he wants to use them to make the United States more competitive - especially in manufacturing and mining. I believe that this will not be effective. But tariffs are very likely to be announced among the early pronouncements.
Canacero disputes US allegations of Mexican steel export threat
Mexican steel trade association Canacero said steel exports from the Latin American country into the US do not pose a threat. And claims that Mexican steel exports have been the driver of US plant closures and layoffs are “unfounded,” the association said. “On the contrary, the US greatly benefits from steel trade flows and has […]
Coated steel trade case update: Postponements and new allegations
The steel industry may have to wait even longer for the initial duty determinations in the pending coated steel unfair trade investigations.
Price on Trade: Next six months will set course of trade for years to come
This may be the most consequential six months for trade policy in recent memory. The wait to see what form Trump's actions take is almost over.