Trade Cases
Commerce to Move Forward on Section 232 Tariffs on GOES
Written by Sandy Williams
November 3, 2020
The Department of Commerce said it plans to move forward to implement tariffs or other trade remedies on imports of electrical steel components. Commerce launched a Section 232 investigation in May 2020 following comments by Cleveland-Cliffs CEO Lourenco Goncalves regarding the continued viability of AK Steel Butler, the sole producer of electrical steel in the United States. Goncalves threated to shut down the recently acquired plant if actions were not taken by the U.S. government to stem circumvention of existing tariffs on grain oriented electrical steel (GOES) products.
Commerce will apply remedies to cover imported laminations and cores of GOES and will review recent exclusions granted to South Korea.
“I am pleased that the Department of Commerce will take action to re-evaluate recently-granted GOES Section 232 product exclusions,” said Goncalves in a statement. “These actions should be viewed as a condemnation of those seeking to circumvent tariffs and quotas imposed under our trade laws and of companies abusing the steel Section 232 product exclusion process.”
Goncalves, with the support of several congressional members, said that 43,000 tons of U.S. electrical steels were displaced though circumvention from 2017 to 2019. “A stunning 95 percent of Canadian and Mexican lamination and core exports are now coming into the United States, yet there is no domestic GOES production in either Canada or Mexico,” said legislators in a letter to Commerce in May.
Last month, five congressional representatives from Virginia, Arkansas and North Carolina disputed the need for additional tariffs or restrictions and said such measures would put at risk 15,000 transformer jobs and undermine the supply of low-cost electricity in the U.S.
“The principal cause of increased imports of cores, laminations and transformers, which are not unfairly traded, is the levying of Section 232 import restrictions on grain-oriented steel into the United States,” said the group. “The transformer industries have relocated operations, principally to Canada and Mexico, to preserve their own competitiveness in the market.”
The group said there was no justification for the tariffs, especially on U.S. allies Canada and Mexico, and would worsen problems for downstream industries.
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
Mills allege ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case vs. South Africa, UAE
"Recent activity in the marketplace strongly indicates that these imports are being rushed into the United States in an effort to avoid the imposition of antidumping duties," petitioners said.
European Commission eyes retaliation vs. Trump steel tariffs: Report
The European Commission is looking into making current quotas on steel imports stricter as a countermeasure to President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the US, according to an article in Reuters.
Trump could levy tariffs on auto imports in April: Report
President Donald Trump said last week that he could place tariffs on auto imports, according to an article in Politico.
Section 232 tariffs are headed downstream
The Trump administration has revealed the list of derivative steel products being added to the Section 232 tariff list.
Leibowitz: In Trump’s brave new world of tariffs, what will stick and what will courts challenge?
With a chronic trade deficit, the administration will continue to cite more tariffs as necessary. This is in error, as noted above. Yet the base of President Trump’s support does not see it that way. More tariffs are possible. But the only way to reduce the US trade deficit substantially is to close the gap between savings and investment in the United States.