Final Thoughts
Final Thoughts
Written by Tim Triplett
September 18, 2020
As of Friday, the National Interagency Fire Center was reporting that 80 large fires were still burning across the western United States. Varying reports indicate the flames have consumed anywhere from 4-7 million acres so far and at least 34 people have died. The death and destruction is heartbreaking, no doubt.
Viewed in terms of their impact on the entire U.S. economy, however, the fires are more a regional calamity, much like a hurricane that batters the coast or a giant snowstorm that paralyzes the northern states.
I sent a note to one of our favorite economists, ITR Economics President Alan Beaulieu, and asked: “I’m wondering if Steel Market Update should be reporting on the fires on the West Coast and their aftermath in terms of their potential impact on commerce, specifically on manufacturing and steel demand. We’ve all seen video of burned out vehicles headed for the scrapyard and destroyed homes that must be rebuilt. Has ITR done any analysis you can share on the fires’ economic impact or is this a tragic, but relatively short-term regional event?”
His kind response: “It’s more B than A, but there will be some benefit that accrues to the steel industry. I would not build a budget around it, though, as it could be a slower and more regional process than many think. Overall, blue tarps and lumber win and insurance companies lose. “
The number of vehicles destroyed is likely to be limited as one would assume people used them to escape the flames, he added. “Hopefully for them, anyways.”
SMU would welcome comments (on or off the record) from readers in the West who would care to share their observations on business conditions and how the fires have affected operations, employees and customers. Just email your thoughts to Tim@SteelMarketUpdate.com.
As hot rolled steel prices approach $600 per ton, are increased foreign offers just around the corner? How high can steel prices rise before the U.S. market starts to attract more imports? The percentage of foreign suppliers currently quoting competitive prices is relatively small, but growing (see chart from SMU’s Sept. 14 poll). Steel Market Update will be keeping a close eye on imports and foreign vs. domestic pricing.
As always, your business is truly appreciated by all of us here at Steel Market Update.
Tim Triplett, Executive Editor
Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Final Thoughts
Final Thoughts
The whole SMU team is packing up our laptops and our SMU polos/cardigans, loading up the PowerPoint slides, and preparing to make the trek down to Florida for the Tampa Steel Conference. There will be plenty to talk about!
Final Thoughts
From one group of folks, I’ve heard that Trump might not wait until Feb. 1 – the date he threatened on to place tariffs on China, Canada, and Mexico. They say he could act as soon as Friday. And then there are those who don’t think anything will happen before April 1. That’s the deadline for Commerce, Treasury, and USTR to submit key reports on “America First Trade Policy” to President Trump.
Final Thoughts
Trump made a clarification in a speech on Monday. Previously, he had declared the word “tariff” the most beautiful word in the dictionary. No longer.
Final Thoughts
President Donald Trump on Sunday hammered Colombia with 25% tariffs and threatened to increase them to 50%. Trump in a post on Truth Social said he took the action not because of a trade dispute but because the South American nation had refused to accept planes carrying deported immigrants. The president also cited "national security" concerns, just as he did to justify 25% Section 232 tariffs on steel in his first term. Even the 50% threat echoes his first term. Turkish steel, like that of most nations, was assessed a 25% tariff in March 2018. Trump doubled Turkey's tariff to 50% via a tweet in August of that year over a matter unrelated to steel.
Final Thoughts
We surveyed many of you this week and asked what you wanted to see from the new Trump administration. Responses were varied but fell largely into three groups: tariffs and trade policy, the Nippon-U.S. Steel deal, and those who are concerned about too much government sway in steel. Some also expressed hope that President Trump would continue the infrastructure spending that began under former President Biden.