Trade Cases
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/media/k2/items/src/953d53b64198ba73a17ac44e35bbd31f.jpg)
Trump Renews Auto Tariff Threat
Written by Sandy Williams
January 28, 2020
Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross says that tariffs on imports of autos and parts are still on the table, refuting claims that the deadline has passed to impose such measures under Section 232.
After Commerce delivered its report on the national security implications of imports of foreign autos to the administration, the president had 180 days to act on the auto tariffs. Since no action was taken, members of Congress and trade analysts contend that the measure is no longer valid. Ross counters that people “simply don’t understand Section 232.”
“What was needed in November was for the president to decide on a path forward. He did — he decided the path forward was to negotiate as long as that was bearing fruit. The November deadline was ‘an imaginary deadline,’” said Ross in an interview with Bloomberg at the World Economic Forum in Davos. “The deadline was that he would take a decision – he took a decision. Period.”
“We have a perfect justification to put tariffs on if we wish to; the president decided it was better to negotiate,” Ross said Thursday. “We’ve had constructive negotiations with the German car manufacturers, with the Koreans and with the Japanese. So far we haven’t felt the need to do it. But if people do silly things, if they do protectionist and discriminatory things, like pillar one of the digital-services tax, we’re obviously going to respond.”
At Davos, President Trump doubled down on his threat to impose auto tariffs on Europe. “We expect to be able to make a deal with Europe. And if they don’t make a deal, we’ll certainly give that very strong consideration,” Trump said.
“Ultimately it will be very easy because if we can’t make a deal, we’ll have to put 25 percent tariffs on their cars,” Trump told Fox Business in an interview.
Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin, during a discussion on digital service taxes, commented, “If people want to just arbitrarily put taxes on our digital companies, we will consider arbitrarily putting taxes on car companies.”
His use of “arbitrary” seemed to undercut what Ross has emphasized is an action necessary to protect national security. Some have claimed that the White House has “weaponized” tariffs to bully its way through trade and policy negotiations.
A recent example of such weaponizing was exposed by the Washington Post on Jan. 15. The Trump administration shocked Germany, France and Britain by threatening auto tariffs if the countries did not formally accuse Iran of violating the 2015 nuclear agreement. According to the Post, the three nations had planned to rebuke Iran anyway, but kept the threat from the U.S. secret to avoid looking weak.
The Trump administration has refused to release the Commerce report that purportedly shows that auto imports threaten the national security of the U.S., citing executive privilege, despite Congress demanding it do so in a provision passed in a spending bill last year.
“Releasing it now would interfere with the president’s ability to protect confidential executive branch communications and could interfere with ongoing negotiations,” said a spokesperson for the Commerce Department. The decision to withhold the report from Congress and the public was supported by the Justice Department.
Said the Justice Department in its decision, “The President may direct the Secretary of Commerce not to publish a confidential report to the President under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, notwithstanding a recently enacted statute requiring publication within 30 days, because the report falls within the scope of executive privilege and its disclosure would risk impairing ongoing diplomatic efforts to address a national-security threat and would risk interfering with executive branch deliberations over what additional actions, if any, may be necessary to address the threat.”
The Center for Automotive Research estimates that the proposed 25 percent tariffs on imported autos and parts could add $6,875 to foreign vehicle prices and $4,400 per car for the overall market.
The Peterson Institute for International Economics agreed, noting the interdependence of the global automotive market.
“Often overlooked when auto tariffs are considered is that, because of border-crossing manufacturing supply chains, there are in fact no 100 percent ‘made in the USA’ cars,” said a report by the institute. “Many so-called ‘foreign cars’ are assembled in the United States—and some contain more domestic content than similar vehicles bearing American name badges.”
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2023/04/sandy-williams.jpeg)
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/images/Featured_News_Icons/galvanized_coil.png)
Leibowitz: The consequences of a new barrage of trade cases on coated steel
Domestic steel producers and the United Steelworkers (USW) union filed a barrage of trade cases last week. This is hardly news. Ever since the Commerce Department ruled that Vietnam is still treated as a nonmarket economy (NME) for antidumping purposes, many in the business expected new cases on the product that Vietnam excels at—“corrosion-resistant steel.” Nor is it a surprise that these cases roped in nine countries in addition to Vietnam: Australia, Brazil, Canada, Mexico, the Netherlands, South Africa, Taiwan, Turkey, and the United Arab Emirates. All these countries rank in the top ten exporters of corrosion-resistant steel to the United States. These petitions are a broadside against coated flat-rolled steel imports.
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/images/Featured_News_Icons/investigate.png)
Coated trade case alleges hefty dumping margins
Domestic mills have alleged substantial dumping margins in the trade case targeting imports of corrosion-resistant steel.
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/images/Featured_News_Icons/fist.png)
US mills file sprawling trade case against coated imports from 10 nations
US mills have filed or soon will file a sprawling trade petition against imports of coated flat-rolled steel from 10 countries. The petition seeks anti-dumping margins against Canada, Mexico, Brazil, the Netherlands, Turkey, the United Arab Emirates, Vietnam, Taiwan, Australia, and South Africa. It also seeks countervailing duty margins against Canada, Mexico, Brazil, and Vietnam. That’s according documents dated Sept. 5 and addressed to Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo and International Trade Commission (ITC) Secretary Lisa Barton.
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/media/k2/items/src/cbd2ad03f626e665deb71b2742b25bbb.jpg)
Steel Summit 2024: Trade issues abound ahead of election
Trade is always front and center in an election year. And 2024 is no different. There is no shortage of issues, with questions like the sale of U.S. Steel to Japan’s Nippon Steel, potential cracks in the USMCA, and Chinese overcapacity dominating the headlines. But how do you distinguish between issues that might just last until November, and what are the crucial questions that could affect your business for years to come?
![](https://www.steelmarketupdate.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/images/Featured_News_Icons/fist.png)
US senators urge reduction to S. Korean OCTG quota
https://www.brown.senate.gov/newsroom/press/release/sherrod-brown-casey-fetterman-biden-administration-level-playing-field-american-octg-industry