SMU Data and Models
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f7de8/f7de852ac3220933ceeb9a1290f55776649ae0a4" alt=""
Drill Down of Cold Rolled Imports into Product Detail
Written by Peter Wright
January 13, 2020
Using U.S. International Trade Commission (USITC) data, Steel Market Update has taken the import tonnage of cold rolled sheet and broken it down into coil and leveled, then our report breaks out four thickness ranges and identifies how much was full hard, annealed and high strength.
Through November 2019, of the total cold rolled sheet and strip imports into the U.S., only 2.4 percent was strip. By gauge range the sheet broke down to: 28.0 percent < 0.5mm, 30.3 percent ≥ 0.5 to 1.0 mm, 40.9 percent> 1 to 3mm thick and 0.7 percent > 3 mm.
Table 1 is a summary for 2019 through November of cold rolled imports showing gauge ranges and condition and the annual year-to-date total for sheet. Strip is itemized separately at the bottom of the table. Both are in metric tons.
Figure 1 breaks the year-to-date cold rolled sheet tonnage down into the four gauge ranges that are identified in the HTS codes.
Figure 2 does the same thing for condition. It identifies the volume of full hard, annealed, high strength and high strength annealed. Year to date November, 45.8 percent was full hard, 44.1 percent was annealed, 2.4 percent was high strength and 7.7 percent was high strength annealed.
Note: This data was accessed through the USITC database. All steel traded globally is classified by the Harmonized Tariff System (HTS). The HTS code has 10 digits. The first six are globally universal. The last four are used at the discretion of the nations involved in a particular transaction and are the basis of this report. The way the U.S. uses the last four digits to define products may be different from other nations’ product classification.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5457a/5457ae2ba1468c9a1853b2536e86841312ea9b24" alt=""
Peter Wright
Read more from Peter WrightLatest in SMU Data and Models
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1643d/1643db575e5c031fbca2639859382fe4441b6b05" alt=""
SMU Survey: Current Buyers’ Sentiment Index jumps, Future Sentiment slips
SMU’s Current Buyers’ Sentiment Index rocketed up this week, while the Future Buyers’ Sentiment Index edged down. The two indices are almost at parity.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/226d9/226d9b4d98ede05bee1f5738951198dc996994ea" alt=""
SMU Survey: Mill lead times stretch to 10-month highs
Buyers responding to our latest market survey reported that steel mill lead times were stretching out this week for sheet and plate products tracked by SMU. The results weren’t much of a surprise. Production times have begun moving out following a wave of frenzied buying in response to stricter Section 232 announced by the Trump […]
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd5cc/cd5ccf8fcd610d16dc861faee6fe045ca677cc79" alt=""
SMU Survey: Mills slam door on buyers looking to talk price
Mills’ flexibility on price for spot orders has taken a nosedive to levels not seen since the end of March 2023.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1643d/1643db575e5c031fbca2639859382fe4441b6b05" alt=""
SMU Survey: Steel Buyers’ Sentiment indicates increased optimism
After reaching multi-month lows in mid-January, SMU’s Steel Buyers’ Sentiment Indices rebounded this week to some of the highest readings recorded in months.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1643d/1643db575e5c031fbca2639859382fe4441b6b05" alt=""
SMU Survey: Mill lead times fluctuate, extensions expected
While we have seen some movements in recent weeks, steel mill production times remain within a few days of the historical lows observed over the last two years, a trend observed since mid-2024.