Trade Cases

Trump Walks Back Threat of Steel Tariffs on Brazil

Written by Sandy Williams


President Trump is walking back his decision to impose tariffs on steel and aluminum imports from Brazil. After accusing Brazil and Argentina earlier this month of currency manipulation that is harming U.S. farmers, and threatening immediate tariffs in retaliation, Trump now says he will not follow through on his threat.

Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro said Trump assured him in a phone call on Friday that Brazil’s aluminum and steel will not be overtaxed. Bolsonaro said the 15-minute call was cordial and respectful.

In a live Facebook announcement after the call, Bolsonaro said, “I was pleased to receive a call from President Trump, a 15-minute conversation. I understood what he wanted and intended to do and gave my arguments to him. He became convinced of my arguments and decided to tell us all that our steel and aluminum will not be overcharged. That way our policy remains the best possible.”

Trump confirmed on Twitter that he had a “great call” with the Brazilian president and discussed “many subjects including trade.”

The surprise announcement by Trump on Dec. 2 shook financial markets causing the Dow Jones to plummet 326 points as investors worried that a new trade war was about to begin. Brazil and Argentina were exempted from Section 232 tariffs after a quota deal was made with the countries in May 2018.

No official order was ever issued following Trump’s December threat and it is unclear whether the steel and aluminum tariffs will potentially be imposed on Argentina. 

Latest in Trade Cases

Price: Should billions in Section 232 revenue go to foreign manufacturers or to the American people?

Do we want the benefits of the Section 232 tariffs to flow to the bottom lines of foreign steel and aluminum producers or to the US government and, ultimately, domestic manufacturers and their workers? In our view, the answer is simple. Section 232 exceptions do nothing more than lead to underserved profits for foreign manufacturers who are harming the US industrial base. That revenue could be used to pursue the Trump administration’s other policy priorities - such as deficit reduction or expanded tax cuts.