Trade Cases
Shipping Industry Wins Chinese Tariff Exemptions
Written by Sandy Williams
August 18, 2019
The trucking industry won a major victory in securing a promise from the U.S. Trade Representative’s office that it will not impose tariffs on imports of Chinese-made 53-foot domestic intermodal containers.
The 10 percent tariff scheduled for imports of the intermodal containers would have cost the logistics sector an additional $63 million in the first year and about $750 million more over the next decade. The average price of a container is about $12,000, according to logistics firm Schneider National.
Bob Costello, American Trucking Association chief economist and senior VP for International Trade Policy, told the USTR in June that there are only two manufacturers of the containers and both are located in China.
“We explained that applying tariffs to these containers would have a tremendous impact on the entire freight logistics industry, and ultimately on U.S. consumers, so we are very pleased with the decision,” said Costello.
The tariff also would have applied to the resale of containers in the U.S., a lucrative business in the secondary market. When ocean and domestic containers have outlived their usefulness they are repaired and sold to various industries as storage units for nonperishable goods.
Port operators were relieved to hear that ship-to-shore cranes have also been removed from the Chinese tariffs scheduled for Sept. 1 and Dec. 15. A 10 percent tariff would cost U.S ports about $1.5 million per crane.
“We were pleased to see that ship-to-shore cranes, straddle carriers, and other port equipment were removed from the list,” said American Association of Port Authorities President Kurt Nagle. “Tariffs on these cranes, which cost upwards of $14 million each, would have harmed ports’ ability to make the infrastructure investments necessary to handle increasing volumes and the larger vessels now being used in ocean trade, hurting U.S. international competitiveness.”
There are only two primary manufacturers of ship-to-shore cranes: China’s Shanghai Zhenhua Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. (ZPMC) and Finland-based Konecranes, which manufactures many of its cranes in Shanghai.
Although the Trump administration has rolled back some of the tariffs it plans to levy on Chinese imports until after Christmas, others will still be implemented, causing frustration for many manufacturers as the holiday season approaches.
“By no means is this a win or a de-escalation,” said American Apparel & Footwear Association President and CEO Rick Helfenbein. “The administration is imposing an additional 10 percent tax on U.S. businesses and U.S. consumers. This is a tax that will hurt every American. Contrary to the headlines, the Grinch has stolen the Christmas selling season for our industry.”
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
Mills allege ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case vs. South Africa, UAE
"Recent activity in the marketplace strongly indicates that these imports are being rushed into the United States in an effort to avoid the imposition of antidumping duties," petitioners said.
European Commission eyes retaliation vs. Trump steel tariffs: Report
The European Commission is looking into making current quotas on steel imports stricter as a countermeasure to President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the US, according to an article in Reuters.
Trump could levy tariffs on auto imports in April: Report
President Donald Trump said last week that he could place tariffs on auto imports, according to an article in Politico.
Section 232 tariffs are headed downstream
The Trump administration has revealed the list of derivative steel products being added to the Section 232 tariff list.
Leibowitz: In Trump’s brave new world of tariffs, what will stick and what will courts challenge?
With a chronic trade deficit, the administration will continue to cite more tariffs as necessary. This is in error, as noted above. Yet the base of President Trump’s support does not see it that way. More tariffs are possible. But the only way to reduce the US trade deficit substantially is to close the gap between savings and investment in the United States.