SMU Data and Models
SMU Analysis: Key Market Indicators Show Slight Improvement
Written by Peter Wright
June 28, 2019
Steel Market Update’s analysis of the Key Market Indicators shows a slight improvement in both our view of the present situation and in the trend of the indicators in June.
This report is designed to be a big picture summary of data on which we have reported in detail during the month. In it we summarize 36 data streams that critically describe the state of the steel market and provide forward guidance for steel buyers and sellers. See the end of this piece for an explanation of the Key Indicators concept. This will explain the difference between our view of the present situation, which is subjective, and our analysis of trends, which is based on the latest facts available.
Please refer to Table 1 for our view of the present situation and the quantitative measure of trends. Readers should regard the color codes in the present situation column as a visual summary of the current market condition. The “Trend” columns of Table 1 are also color coded to give a quick visual appreciation of the direction the market is headed. All results are the latest available as of June 30, 2019.
Present Situation
Our view of the June data is that the present situation is still strong, but there has been a deterioration since February. The number of indicators regarded negatively hasn’t changed much in a year and a half, but the number regarded positively has declined since December last year. This means that the number regarded as historically mid-range (normal) has increased from seven to 14 between December 2018 and June 2019. Figure 1 shows the history of our view of the present situation data since January 2010 on a percentage basis and on the far left of the chart is the August 2008 situation immediately before the recession struck the steel business in September that year. Our view of the June data is that of the 36 indicators, 17 are currently positive, 14 are normal and five are negative. This was a decrease of two in the number of indicators that we consider positive, a decrease of one negative and an increase of three normal since our May update. Our intent in using the word normal is to say that this indicator is in the mid-range of historical data. Since the end of May, our view of the Chicago Fed National Activity Index improved from negative to normal and our view of the prices of both coking coal and hot band deteriorated from positive to normal. There were no changes in our view of the long products steel section or in the construction and manufacturing sections.
Trends
Most values in the trends columns are three-month moving averages (3MMA) to smooth out what can be very erratic monthly data. Trend changes in the individual sectors are described below together with some general comments. (Please note that in most cases this is not June data but data that was released in June for previous months.)
Figure 2 shows the trend of the trends and the pre-recession situation at the far left of the chart. In June 2019, 19 indicators were trending positive and 17 negative. Six indicators reversed direction in the June data resulting in a net increase of one positive trend and a decrease of one negative. There has been a gradual deterioration in the number of positively trending indicators since February 2018.
Trend changes in the June data were as follows: In the general economy, the yield spread and the Chicago Fed National Activity index reversed direction and improved as consumer confidence moved in the opposite direction. In the raw materials section in June, only the price of iron ore was trending positive; coking coal reversed direction when the price declined. In the two steel sections, the import market share of long products declined (positive) and the import market share of sheet products increased (negative.). There were no trend reversals in the construction and manufacturing sections of the report. Five of the six construction indicators are trending positive and three of the five manufacturing indicators are trending negative.
As a reality check for this report we include here Figure 3, which is SMU’s Steel Buyers Sentiment Index. Readings are developed through the SMU market surveys that are conducted twice per month. SMU Steel Buyers Sentiment is a measure of the current attitude of North American buyers and sellers of flat rolled products regarding their company’s opportunity for success in today’s market. A reading above the neutral point of zero indicates that a preponderance of buyers have a positive attitude. The index has been deteriorating since mid-February last year. The mid-June value was still positive 46.0, but down from a peak of +78 in January 2018
We believe a continued examination of both the present situation and direction is a valuable tool for corporate business planning. Figures 1 and 2 both show the pre-recession situation in August 2008. The trends analysis shows that the steel market was going over a cliff, but the actual values of the indicators at that time were still good with only 23 percent registering as historically negative.
Explanation: The point of this analysis is to give both a quick visual appreciation of the market situation and a detailed description for those who want to dig deeper. It describes where we are now and the direction the market is headed and is designed to describe the situation on a specific date. The chart is stacked vertically to separate the primary indicators of the general economy, of raw material prices, of both sheet and long product market indicators, and of construction and manufacturing indicators. The indicators are classified as leading, coincident or lagging as shown in the third column.
Columns in the chart are designed to differentiate between where the market is today and the direction it is pointing. Our evaluation of the present situation is subjectively based on our opinion of the historical value of each indicator. There is nothing subjective about the trends section, which provides the latest facts available on the date of publication. It is quite possible for the present situation to be predominantly red and trends to be predominantly green or vice versa depending on the overall situation and direction of the market. The present situation is subdivided into: below the historical norm (-), (OK), and above the historical norm (+). The “Values” section of the chart is a quantitative definition of the market’s direction. In most cases, values are three-month moving averages to eliminate noise. In cases where seasonality is an issue, the evaluation of market direction is made on a year-over-year comparison to eliminate this effect. Where seasonality is not an issue, concurrent periods are compared. The date of the latest data is identified in the third values column. Values will always be current as of the date of publication. Finally, the far-right column quantifies the trend as a percentage or numerical change with color code classification to indicate positive or negative direction.
Peter Wright
Read more from Peter WrightLatest in SMU Data and Models
SMU Survey: Steel Buyers’ Sentiment Indices contrast at year end
Both of our Sentiment Indices remain in positive territory and indicate that steel buyers are optimistic about the success of their businesses.
SMU Survey: Mill lead times contract slightly, remain short
Steel mill production times have seen very little change since September, according to buyers participating in our latest market survey.
SMU Survey: Buyers report mills are slightly less flexible on pricing
Steel buyers of sheet and plate products say mills are still willing to bend on spot pricing this week, though not quite as much as they were two weeks prior, according to our most recent survey data.
December energy market update
Trends in energy prices and active rig counts are leading demand indicators for oil country tubular goods (OCTG), line pipe and other steel products
Apparent steel supply remained near two-year low in October
Referred to as ‘apparent steel supply’, we calculate this volume by combining domestic steel mill shipments with finished US steel imports and deducting total US steel exports.