Final Thoughts
Final Thoughts
Written by Tim Triplett
May 29, 2019
Editor’s note: John Packard is on vacation.
A year into President Trump’s policy of imposing extra import duties to offset a U.S. trade imbalance, public opinion on the impact of tariffs remains divided, with few seeing an economic benefit, according to the latest Monmouth University Poll conducted last week. A majority of those responding expect that American consumers will bear the brunt of the latest round of tariffs on Chinese goods and they are not particularly hopeful that this policy will bring the manufacture of those goods back to U.S. soil.
National public opinion is divided on the issue of imposing tariffs on products imported from other countries, with 32 percent saying tariffs are generally good for the U.S. and 37 percent saying they are generally bad. Another 32 percent are not sure or say it depends. Most Americans (62 percent) feel that U.S. consumers will bear the brunt of paying for new tariffs on Chinese goods. Just 23 percent say that Chinese producers will bear more of these costs.
Free trade agreements with other countries continue to be more popular than tariffs, with 51 percent saying free trade is generally good for the U.S. and just 14 percent saying these agreements are bad. Another 35 percent are unsure.
Only 24 percent feel it is very likely that U.S. companies will bring the manufacture of these products back to the U.S. as a result of the tariffs, while 35 percent say this is somewhat likely to happen and 33 percent say it is not likely. More than 6-in-10 Americans are either very (34 percent) or somewhat (28 percent) concerned that their local economy will be hurt by a trade war with China.
“Trump’s tariff policy has not won any converts over the past year. And now, most Americans say that they will ultimately foot the bill from a widening trade war with China,” said Patrick Murray, director of the independent Monmouth University Polling Institute.
Attitudes revealed by the Monmouth University Poll on Chinese tariffs are mirrored in the steel market, where steel consumers, OEMs and fabricators, breathed a sigh of relief earlier this month when the Trump administration removed the Section 232 tariffs on steel imports from Canada and Mexico. Their belief is that competition from steelmakers to the north and south will help to keep steel prices low and clear the way for passage of the new North American free trade agreement. Despite widespread views favoring free trade, final approval of the new NAFTA by the legislatures in all three countries is not yet assured. Late breaking reports out of Washington indicate that President Trump is now threatening a new 5 percent tariff on Mexican imports, complaining that Mexico has not done enough the stem the flow of asylum seekers from Central America to the United States. Legislators in both the U.S. and Canada continue to air concerns about the language in the pact, which continue to stymie its ratification.
The hotels are filling up fast for Steel Market Update’s Steel Summit, set for Aug. 26-28 in Atlanta. If you are planning to attend the industry’s premier educational and networking event, we recommend you make your reservations sooner rather than later to secure your preferred lodging. The registration link for the conference can be found here or you can go to our website: www.SteelMarketUpdate.com/Events/Steel-Summit
Click here for information on how to nominate that talented young executive in your organization for SMU’s new NexGen Leadership Award. The winner will be honored during the Steel Summit in August.
As always, your business is truly appreciated by all of us here at Steel Market Update.
Tim Triplett, Executive Editor
Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Final Thoughts
Final Thoughts
And just like that, we’re wrapping up the last SMU newsletter of 2024. We’re closing out our 19th year and looking with wide-eyed anticipation to what 2025 will bring.
Final Thoughts
SMU looks back at stories from Decembers past, one, five, 10, and 100 years ago.
Final Thoughts
It's that time of year again. You know, that time when people wonder if those things are drones in New Jersey or if the aliens are ready to come onto the stage just in time for Inauguration Day. What will that do for steel price volatility? In any case, the SMU team finds itself in Pittsburgh this week.
Final Thoughts
The Community Chat last Wednesday with ITR economist Taylor St. Germain is worth listening to if you couldn’t tune in live. You can find the replay and Taylor’s slide deck here. You can also find SMU reporter Stephanie Ritenbaugh’s writeup of the webinar here. Taylor is Alan Beaulieu’s protégé at ITR. Many of you know Alan from his talks at SMU Steel Summit. I found Taylor’s analysis just as insightful as Alan’s.
Final Thoughts
Cracks have formed in what has been presented as the Biden administration’s united front against Nippon Steel’s play for U.S. Steel. A report from the Financial Times said parts of the administration are at odds on the deal.