Trade Cases
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ba5a4/ba5a4eff18ce7b2fb350c83e3f7dc9bee841e2f3" alt=""
Leibowitz on Trade: Tariffs Due Friday on Chinese Imports
Written by Lewis Leibowitz
May 9, 2019
Trade attorney and Steel Market Update contributor Lewis Leibowitz offers the following update on events in Washington:
As President Trump tweeted this past Sunday, the U.S. Trade Representative has issued a notice that List Three of the tariffs on Chinese imports will be subject to 25 percent tariffs effective 12:01 a.m. Eastern time on Friday, May 10. The notice appeared in the Federal Register today. The wording of the notice is a bit unusual.
The language of the Annex to the notice has an unusual qualification on the effectiveness of the 25 percent tariffs included in List Three: “Effective with respect to goods (i) entered for consumption, or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption, on or after 12:01 a.m. eastern daylight time on May 10, 2019, and (ii) exported to the United States on or after May 10, 2019,…” the rate of duty will be 25 percent.
The italicized language appears to delay the effective date of the new tariff rate until entry is made after midnight tonight of goods “exported” on or after May 10, 2019. The language does not say “exported from China,” but it clearly says “exported.” If goods coming to the United States were exported before May 10, the new tariff rate does not seem to apply. Perhaps this provides a few extra weeks for negotiation before the trade war is fully escalated. Perhaps not. Still trying to determine the precise effect of the quoted language. Customs and Border Protection is reported to be trying to interpret the language also. This kind of qualifier is decidedly rare, if not unprecedented. Interesting indeed.
The notice also commits the USTR to issue procedures for exclusion from the List Three goods. The notice includes no details—but I’ll be on the lookout for a new notice, which could appear at any time.
Click here to visit the Federal Register website to view the notice in its entirety.
Lewis Leibowitz
The Law Office of Lewis E. Leibowitz
1400 16th Street, N.W.
Suite 350
Washington, D.C. 20036
Phone: (202) 776-1142
Fax: (202) 861-2924
Cell: (202) 250-1551
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5f73c/5f73c71fbd3766099ce4d40dcc169980c734f19e" alt="Lewis Leibowitz, SMU Contributor"
Lewis Leibowitz
Read more from Lewis LeibowitzLatest in Trade Cases
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d3a8a/d3a8a44458f8535cda37f74ca219e1e0e2ea9882" alt=""
Mills allege ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case vs. South Africa, UAE
"Recent activity in the marketplace strongly indicates that these imports are being rushed into the United States in an effort to avoid the imposition of antidumping duties," petitioners said.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd5cc/cd5ccf8fcd610d16dc861faee6fe045ca677cc79" alt=""
European Commission eyes retaliation vs. Trump steel tariffs: Report
The European Commission is looking into making current quotas on steel imports stricter as a countermeasure to President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the US, according to an article in Reuters.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1df9/c1df9ccee32d1383fa0b9bd73a6e14fd64318936" alt="The White House"
Trump could levy tariffs on auto imports in April: Report
President Donald Trump said last week that he could place tariffs on auto imports, according to an article in Politico.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4ede/c4ede29c075e98ef5ee69f321caea25835be56b8" alt=""
Section 232 tariffs are headed downstream
The Trump administration has revealed the list of derivative steel products being added to the Section 232 tariff list.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/84bda/84bda1ccb5c0ca2fd6f7fcd8c2ca758876bf3bbb" alt=""
Leibowitz: In Trump’s brave new world of tariffs, what will stick and what will courts challenge?
With a chronic trade deficit, the administration will continue to cite more tariffs as necessary. This is in error, as noted above. Yet the base of President Trump’s support does not see it that way. More tariffs are possible. But the only way to reduce the US trade deficit substantially is to close the gap between savings and investment in the United States.