Trade Cases
CRU: Quotas Would Only Add to the Volatility
Written by Tim Triplett
April 18, 2019
Steel interests in North America and the rest of the world are watching intently to see if the Trump administration grants some tariff relief to Canada and Mexico to clear the way for final approval of the new U.S.-Canada-Mexico Trade Agreement. One possible compromise being discussed (albeit one so far opposed by the U.S. trading partners) is replacing the 25 percent Section 232 tariffs on steel with some form of quota.
Speaking during a webinar hosted by CRU and the CME Group earlier today, CRU Principal Analyst Josh Spoores said quotas may help secure the trade agreement, but will only add to the price volatility plaguing the hot rolled market.
What form the quotas might take is still unknown. There is precedent in quotas on South Korean steel, which limit their exports to the U.S. to 70 percent of historical averages. In the case of Canada and Mexico, it’s more likely the quotas would be set at 100 percent of recent shipments so as not to punish the two nations but to prevent a surge of steel into the U.S. once the tariffs were lifted, Spoores said.
Quotas might help secure the NAFTA 2.0 trade agreement, but will only worsen the volatility in steel shipments and pricing, Spoores predicts. In situations where quotas are set by quarter, such as finished steel from South Korea and slabs from Brazil, imports tend to be front-loaded. The result is a dramatic increase in imports and prices in the first month of each quarter, followed by declines in both as the material is processed and released into the market.
“Quotas would lead to much higher volatility throughout the year,” Spoores said.
Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Trade Cases
Price: Should billions in Section 232 revenue go to foreign manufacturers or to the American people?
Do we want the benefits of the Section 232 tariffs to flow to the bottom lines of foreign steel and aluminum producers or to the US government and, ultimately, domestic manufacturers and their workers? In our view, the answer is simple. Section 232 exceptions do nothing more than lead to underserved profits for foreign manufacturers who are harming the US industrial base. That revenue could be used to pursue the Trump administration’s other policy priorities - such as deficit reduction or expanded tax cuts.
Mills allege ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case vs. South Africa, UAE
"Recent activity in the marketplace strongly indicates that these imports are being rushed into the United States in an effort to avoid the imposition of antidumping duties," petitioners said.
European Commission eyes retaliation vs. Trump steel tariffs: Report
The European Commission is looking into making current quotas on steel imports stricter as a countermeasure to President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the US, according to an article in Reuters.
Trump could levy tariffs on auto imports in April: Report
President Donald Trump said last week that he could place tariffs on auto imports, according to an article in Politico.
Section 232 tariffs are headed downstream
The Trump administration has revealed the list of derivative steel products being added to the Section 232 tariff list.