Trade Cases
Bills to Limit Trump's Use of Section 232 Get Bipartisan Support
Written by Sandy Williams
March 7, 2019
Senate Finance Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) is onboard with an effort to restrict President Trump’s ability to use national security as a reason to impose tariffs. Grassley reportedly has told his staff to work with Sens. Pat Toomey (R-PA) and Rob Portman (R-OH) to create legislation that would garner enough Senate support to override a veto by the president.
Two bills have already been introduced to Congress that would curtail presidential authority under Section 232.
The Trade Security Act of 2019, re-introduced by Portman in February, allows Congress to pass a joint resolution of disapproval on tariffs imposed by the president on perceived import threats to national security. It would also call on the Pentagon to conduct national security investigations into the impact of any imports targeted by the president. Commerce would consult with the Pentagon and USTR for recommendations to address any threats. The act would apply to new tariffs only.
The Bicameral Congressional Trade Authority Act of 2019, introduced by Toomey, would require Congress to approve any Section 232 adjustment to imports and would restrict national security probes to “goods with applications in military equipment, energy resources, and/or critical infrastructure.” The Toomey bill would allow Congress to review and repeal current Section 232 restrictions.
Rep. Ron Kind (D-WI), who sponsored similar bills in the House, suggested that the Portman bill would likely have more congressional support.
On Wednesday, the conservative group Americans for Prosperity, backed by Charles Koch, launched a digital ad campaign to urge Republicans and Democrats to support legislation to limit Trump’s authority to impose new tariffs.
“Tariffs are destructive taxes on American producers and consumers. They threaten to undermine the economic growth the Trump administration has encouraged through tax reform and removing regulatory burdens,” said Americans for Prosperity President Tim Phillips.
“Congress should hold an up-or-down vote before tariffs proposed by a president can take effect…. We strongly encourage these senators and representatives to get on board and cosponsor this bipartisan legislation. This is a top trade priority for our organization and we’ll continue to press Congress to make it a reality.”
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
Price: Should billions in Section 232 revenue go to foreign manufacturers or to the American people?
Do we want the benefits of the Section 232 tariffs to flow to the bottom lines of foreign steel and aluminum producers or to the US government and, ultimately, domestic manufacturers and their workers? In our view, the answer is simple. Section 232 exceptions do nothing more than lead to underserved profits for foreign manufacturers who are harming the US industrial base. That revenue could be used to pursue the Trump administration’s other policy priorities - such as deficit reduction or expanded tax cuts.
Mills allege ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case vs. South Africa, UAE
"Recent activity in the marketplace strongly indicates that these imports are being rushed into the United States in an effort to avoid the imposition of antidumping duties," petitioners said.
European Commission eyes retaliation vs. Trump steel tariffs: Report
The European Commission is looking into making current quotas on steel imports stricter as a countermeasure to President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the US, according to an article in Reuters.
Trump could levy tariffs on auto imports in April: Report
President Donald Trump said last week that he could place tariffs on auto imports, according to an article in Politico.
Section 232 tariffs are headed downstream
The Trump administration has revealed the list of derivative steel products being added to the Section 232 tariff list.