Trade Cases
Data Still Lags Following Government Shutdown
Written by Peter Wright
February 18, 2019
The government shutdown is over but much of the data that Steel Market Update uses in its regular analyses for Premium members is still not available. This is a brief summary of where we are today in the process of data recovery.
The longest government shutdown in U.S. history, lasting 35 days from Dec. 22 to Jan. 25, disrupted the operations of many federal agencies, including the Department of Commerce, a primary source for trade and construction data. The Departments of Labor and Energy were not affected.
Trade: SIMA, the Steel Import Monitoring and Analysis system, released the January import license data promptly on Feb. 5, but they still haven’t released the export data for December. At SMU, we extract all our detailed import data from the USITC DataWeb. These reports include imports by district and source nation and product details of HRC and CRC. The USITC still has not updated for December and our e-mail request for a release schedule has not been answered.
Construction: The construction data for December should have been released on Feb. 4, but a statement on the Commerce website announces that the next data release won’t be until March 4. This was the original date for release of the January data. At this time, we are assuming that both December and January data will be released on March 4, but we don’t know for sure.
Supply of All Steel Products: The SMU report scheduled for publication of this data was Feb. 10. Our market supply calculation is based on AISI mill shipments minus exports plus imports. This report is in limbo until SIMA publishes December’s export volume.
GDP: The first estimate of GDP growth in Q4 2018 should have been released on Jan. 25. As of this date, there has been no update.
The partial government shutdown was extremely disruptive of data delivery and is taking longer to recover than expected. We apologize for our failure to publish Premium reports, but want to assure our subscribers that as soon as data is released, we will analyze it and publish accordingly.
Peter Wright
Read more from Peter WrightLatest in Trade Cases
Mills allege ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case vs. South Africa, UAE
"Recent activity in the marketplace strongly indicates that these imports are being rushed into the United States in an effort to avoid the imposition of antidumping duties," petitioners said.
European Commission eyes retaliation vs. Trump steel tariffs: Report
The European Commission is looking into making current quotas on steel imports stricter as a countermeasure to President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the US, according to an article in Reuters.
Trump could levy tariffs on auto imports in April: Report
President Donald Trump said last week that he could place tariffs on auto imports, according to an article in Politico.
Section 232 tariffs are headed downstream
The Trump administration has revealed the list of derivative steel products being added to the Section 232 tariff list.
Leibowitz: In Trump’s brave new world of tariffs, what will stick and what will courts challenge?
With a chronic trade deficit, the administration will continue to cite more tariffs as necessary. This is in error, as noted above. Yet the base of President Trump’s support does not see it that way. More tariffs are possible. But the only way to reduce the US trade deficit substantially is to close the gap between savings and investment in the United States.