Economy

Tax Foundation: Tariffs Take a Toll on Taxpayers and GDP

Written by Tim Triplett


Trump administration tariffs will increase the tax burden on Americans, especially lower and middle-income households, and will cost the economy thousands of jobs, according to a new report from The Tax Foundation, a conservative-leaning tax policy research organization.

Trump has placed tariffs on steel, aluminum, washing machines, and thousands of other products that American businesses and consumers buy from China, effectively imposing $42 billion worth of new taxes on Americans. If the president follows through on his threats to impose further tariffs on Chinese goods, Americans could see additional tax increases totaling up to $129 billion, the foundation claims.

Tariffs are a type of excise tax that is levied on goods produced abroad at the time of import. They are intended to increase consumption of goods manufactured at home by increasing the price of foreign-produced goods. Though tariffs may afford some short-term protection for domestic industries by shielding them from foreign competitors, they do so at the expense of others in the economy, including consumers and other industries, resulting in less economic output on net, the Tax Foundation argues.

The Trump administration has imposed nearly $42 billion worth of tariffs so far, including:

  • 25 percent tariff on imported steel, which amounts to about a $7.3 billion tax increase.
  • 10 percent tariff on imported aluminum, which amounts to a nearly $1.7 billion tax increase.
  • Doubled steel and aluminum tariffs on Turkey, which is a tax increase of roughly $0.34 billion.
  • 25 percent tariff on $50 billion worth of imports from China, which amounts to a $12.5 billion tax increase.
  • 10 percent tariff on $200 billion worth of imports from China, which amounts to a $20 billion tax increase.
  • Tariffs on washing machines, which amount to about a $0.15 billion tax increase.

The administration has also threatened to impose $129 billion in additional import duties, which would include new tariffs on automobiles and auto parts, as well as escalated tariffs on imports from China. These include:

  • 25 percent tariff on Chapter 87 auto imports, which amounts to a roughly $73.1 billion tax increase.
  • 25 percent tariff, up from the 10 percent tariff, on $200 billion worth of imports from China, which amounts to a tax increase of $30 billion.
  • 10 percent tariff on approximately $267 billion of additional imports from China, which amounts to a $26.7 billion tax increase.

According to the Tax Foundation model, the tariffs imposed so far by the Trump administration would reduce long-run GDP by 0.12 percent ($30.4 billion) and wages by 0.08 percent and eliminate 94,300 full-time equivalent jobs. If the administration moves ahead with its threats to impose additional tariffs, long-run GDP would fall by 0.38 percent ($94.4 billion) and wages by 0.24 percent, and 292,600 full-time equivalent jobs would be eliminated.

The distributional effects of a tariff (the economic burden it places on households across income levels) tend to be regressive, burdening lower-income households more than higher-income households, the foundation said. If the threatened tariffs are imposed, households in the middle quintile (40 to 60 percent range) could see an average decrease in their annual after-tax income of $453.

Latest in Economy

CRU: Dollar and bond yields rise, metal prices fall as Trump wins election

Donald Trump has won the US presidential election. The Republican party has re-taken control of the Senate. Votes are still being counted in many tight congressional races. But based on results so far, the Republicans seem likely to maintain control of the House of Representatives. If confirmed, this will give Trump considerable scope to pass legislation pursuing his agenda. What this means for US policy is not immediately obvious. Trump will not be inaugurated until Jan. 20. In the coming weeks and months, he will begin to assemble his cabinet, which may give a clearer signal on his policy priorities and approaches. Based on statements he made during the presidential campaign, we have set out the likely direction of his economic policy here and green policy here.