Trade Cases
Chamber Urges Trump to Terminate Tariffs on Canada and Mexico
Written by Sandy Williams
December 13, 2018
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce announced its support of the new North American trade agreement, but urges the administration to drop the Section 232 steel and aluminum tariffs on Canada and Mexico.
Chamber of Commerce President and CEO Thomas Donahue cites the onerous financial impact the tariffs have had on Chamber members and urged their removal. “A critical first step is lifting the tariffs on steel and aluminum imports from Canada and Mexico that were supposed to end once the USMCA was agreed to,” said Donahue. “These tariffs – imposed on our partners as a negotiating tactic – have invited $15 billion in counter-tariffs on U.S. agricultural and manufactured goods. Every week that the tariffs remain in place, $500 million in U.S. imports and exports are affected, inflicting significant harm on American workers, farmers and ranchers. They must be eliminated without delay.”
Donahue also disagrees with the president’s decision to terminate NAFTA in order to present the incoming Congress with a choice between the new trade agreement or no agreement at all.
“U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer has insisted that the USMCA was negotiated in such a way to attract bipartisan support,” said Donahue. “So essentially, issuing this threat against a co-equal branch of government is neither necessary nor productive and could actually cost votes.
“This is a risky gambit when you consider that withdrawal from NAFTA without a successor agreement could jeopardize 1.8 million American jobs. We are urging the administration to drop this threat. The USMCA is a good agreement, and the business community will help make that case to Congress.”
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
Price: Should billions in Section 232 revenue go to foreign manufacturers or to the American people?
Do we want the benefits of the Section 232 tariffs to flow to the bottom lines of foreign steel and aluminum producers or to the US government and, ultimately, domestic manufacturers and their workers? In our view, the answer is simple. Section 232 exceptions do nothing more than lead to underserved profits for foreign manufacturers who are harming the US industrial base. That revenue could be used to pursue the Trump administration’s other policy priorities - such as deficit reduction or expanded tax cuts.
Mills allege ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case vs. South Africa, UAE
"Recent activity in the marketplace strongly indicates that these imports are being rushed into the United States in an effort to avoid the imposition of antidumping duties," petitioners said.
European Commission eyes retaliation vs. Trump steel tariffs: Report
The European Commission is looking into making current quotas on steel imports stricter as a countermeasure to President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the US, according to an article in Reuters.
Trump could levy tariffs on auto imports in April: Report
President Donald Trump said last week that he could place tariffs on auto imports, according to an article in Politico.
Section 232 tariffs are headed downstream
The Trump administration has revealed the list of derivative steel products being added to the Section 232 tariff list.