Trade Cases
Business Forward: Tariffs Causing “Demand Destruction”
Written by Sandy Williams
December 13, 2018
A new American Steel Index report by Business Forward shows U.S. steel prices have risen 7.4 percent since February, while foreign steel prices have fallen 9.8 percent. As a result, American manufacturers are paying 17.2 percent more for hot- and cold-rolled steel than their foreign competitors.
“President Trump’s tariffs on steel and aluminum are increasing consumer prices and hurting American exports,” said Business Forward President Jim Doyle. The long-term costs of tariffs are becoming clear, he added, as production moves overseas and firms cut back on capital investment.
The Section 232 tariffs are intended to reduce steel imports and strengthen U.S. manufacturing. Instead, the opposite effect is occurring as manufacturers switch strategies to importing more finished products from abroad while manufacturing less in the United States. Business Forward refers to this phenomenon as “demand destruction.”
“In order to have great manufacturing, a country or region must have cheap or affordable materials and energy,” said Josh Spoores, Principal Steel Analyst for CRU. “The U.S. has energy, but steel is not cheap. You also will see substitution and once that comes, it is challenging for a switch back.”
Business Forward maintains that the Trump administration’s defense of tariffs by comparing price increases for steel to finished product prices is wrong. “They should compare price increases with a manufacturer’s profit margin,” says Doyle. Higher steel prices are increasing input costs and negatively impacting profits for U.S. manufacturing firms.
Business Forward describes itself as a civic-minded, bipartisan advisory organization that works with business leaders across the country to advise Washington on how to create jobs and accelerate the economy.
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
Price on Trade: IEEPA tariffs head to the Supreme Court, DOJ ramps up trade enforcement
International trade law and policy remain a hot topic in Washington and beyond this week. We are paying special attention to the ongoing litigation of the president’s tariff policies and the administration’s efforts to heighten trade enforcement.
Mexico considers stiff tariffs for steel, autos, and other imports
Mexico is considering imposing steep tariffs on imports of steel, automobiles, and over 1,400 other products. Its target? Countries with which it does not have free trade agreements, mainly China, India, Thailand, and other South Asian nations.
Leibowitz: With ‘reciprocal’ tariffs struck down again in court, what happens next?
President Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Policy Act (IEEPA) were struck down again, this time on Aug. 29 by the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC). The legal and policy mess continues, with the next stop being the US Supreme Court.
Market unfazed by US circuit court’s IEEPA decision
Repealing any reciprocal tariffs placed by President Donald Trump on US imports of direct reduced iron (DRI), iron ore, hot-briquetted iron (HBI), and pig iron would have only a nominal impact on the US steel market, market participants said.
ITC votes to keep HR duties after sunset review
The US government determined this week that hot-rolled steel imports from a handful of countries continue to threaten the domestic steel industry.