Trade Cases
Mexico Considering Retaliatory Steel & Aluminum Tariffs
Written by Sandy Williams
November 29, 2018
Tariffs on U.S. steel and aluminum exports to Mexico may be coming if the Trump administration does not drop its Section 232 tariffs on Mexican imports, says Mexican steel association Canacero.
“They already agreed, this government and the incoming one, that we will apply resounding mirror measures,” Canacero Vice President Raul Gutierrez said at a news conference Tuesday at the Institute for Industrial Development and Economic Growth (IDIC).
Canacero stated in a letter to the current and incoming administration earlier this month that it was “not feasible to have a new agreement such as the USMCA, which seeks to promote regional integration and at the same time limit trade in key sectors for Mexico.”
The letter continued, “When markets are attacked, inevitably it ends up eliminating the generation of value of regional integration.”
Mexico’s new government under Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador demands tariffs be lifted before Mexico will sign the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement.
Officials from the U.S. and Mexico have been working on a deal that would substitute quotas for the tariffs. Mexico advocates a quota of 130 to 150 percent of the country’s average exports from 2015 to 2017. The U.S., however, is reportedly seeking a quota below Mexico’s current export level.
Sen. Rob Portman (R-OH), a member of the Senate Finance Committee and a former U.S. Trade Representative, cast doubt on the USMCA signing that is expected to take place at the G20 summit in Buenos Aires, Argentina.
“I think in the next few days we’re going to find out how that gets resolved because my sense is that Mexico might not sign the agreement at the end of this week unless there’s some resolution on steel and aluminum, at least as to Mexico,” said Portman in remarks at the Hudson Institute on Wednesday.
Even if Canada and Mexico sign the agreement, it will still need to be ratified by Congress, which may not occur until next year when the Democrats take over the House. Implementing the legislation will be challenging, but will have bipartisan support, said Portman.
“I think we can get it done,” he said. “Some, as you know, push to get it done quicker — including me — but that’s not likely.”
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
Price: Should billions in Section 232 revenue go to foreign manufacturers or to the American people?
Do we want the benefits of the Section 232 tariffs to flow to the bottom lines of foreign steel and aluminum producers or to the US government and, ultimately, domestic manufacturers and their workers? In our view, the answer is simple. Section 232 exceptions do nothing more than lead to underserved profits for foreign manufacturers who are harming the US industrial base. That revenue could be used to pursue the Trump administration’s other policy priorities - such as deficit reduction or expanded tax cuts.
Mills allege ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case vs. South Africa, UAE
"Recent activity in the marketplace strongly indicates that these imports are being rushed into the United States in an effort to avoid the imposition of antidumping duties," petitioners said.
European Commission eyes retaliation vs. Trump steel tariffs: Report
The European Commission is looking into making current quotas on steel imports stricter as a countermeasure to President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the US, according to an article in Reuters.
Trump could levy tariffs on auto imports in April: Report
President Donald Trump said last week that he could place tariffs on auto imports, according to an article in Politico.
Section 232 tariffs are headed downstream
The Trump administration has revealed the list of derivative steel products being added to the Section 232 tariff list.