Trade Cases
Senators Call for Review of Tariff Exclusion Process
Written by Tim Triplett
November 27, 2018
In response to widespread concerns about the pace, transparency and fairness of the Section 232 steel and aluminum tariff exclusion process, a bipartisan group of senators has requested that the Government Accountability Office conduct an independent review of the Commerce Department’s performance.
In a Nov. 26 letter to the GAO, U.S. Senators Doug Jones (D-Ala.), Pat Toomey (R-Pa.), and Tom Carper (D-Del.) called for the review. Commerce had received 49,301 exclusion petitions and had issued decisions for just 16,567 (34 percent) of them as of the end of October. In their letter, the senators called for GAO to investigate key questions about the current process, including the criteria used to approve or deny an exclusion petition, how to improve the pace of the process and the cost to taxpayers.
“The Commerce Department exclusion process for the Trump administration’s tariffs on steel and aluminum has generated a large backlog of petitions and has placed significant burdens on American businesses,” the senators wrote. “As a result of the Section 232 actions, U.S. trading partners have levied retaliatory tariffs on billions of dollars of American exports. In addition, several countries, including U.S. allies like Canada, Mexico and the European Union (EU), have filed disputes against the United States using the World Trade Organization (WTO) dispute mechanism.”
The Trump administration maintains that duties of 25 percent on steel imports and 10 percent on aluminum imports are needed to protect domestic metals production, which is essential for national security, from unfair foreign competition. The tariffs took effect in March on imports from most countries and in June on Mexico, Canada and the EU. Congress could use the findings of the GAO report to push for changes to the exclusion process next year.
Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Trade Cases
Nippon respects HR dumping decision, expects lower rate in next review
Nippon Steel says it respects the US Department of Commerce’s findings in administrative reviews despite the agency recently assigning the Japanese steelmaker a higher dumping margin.
CRU: Trump tariffs could stimulate steel demand
Now that the dust has settled from the US election, as have the immediate reactions in the equity, bond, and commodity markets, this is a prime opportunity to look at how a second Trump presidency might affect the US steel market.
Rebar import duties to continue for 5 more years
Import duties on rebar from a handful of countries will continue to be collected for at least another five years.
Leibowitz: Trump 2.0 signals Cold War 2.0 trade and China policies
China is one of the elephants in the room as the transition to Trump 2.0 continues. While the people and policies are still being formulated, it’s possible to detect a strategy for the new Trump administration. I think there are two imperative issues that the new administration needs to balance. The Trump strategy will, I believe, follow the following points. First, trade is one of the issues that got President Trump elected in 2016 and 2024—it nearly got him elected in 2020, save for the pandemic. If President Trump had won in 2020, I might be writing chronicles about the end of his eight years in the White House now instead of projecting what the next Trump administration would accomplish or break. Oh, well—that’s life. Trade will necessarily be a key feature of relations with China for the next four years.
Commerce says Nippon dumped steel in US in 2022-23
Commerce determined a significant dumping margin for hot-rolled steel imports from Japan's Nippon Steel.