Steel Mills
AK Steel Reports Best Q3 in 10 Years
Written by Sandy Williams
October 28, 2018
AK Steel reported its best third quarter in 10 years with net income of $67.2 million and a 39 percent year-over-year jump in adjusted EBITDA to $160.8 million.
Steady shipment levels and higher steel selling prices and shipments more than offset higher costs for certain raw materials, transportation and supplies, including graphite electrodes, said the company.
AK Steel shipped 1.4 million tons of flat-rolled steel in the third quarter, a 1.0 percent decline from the second quarter but a 4.0 percent increase from a year ago. Net sales totaled $1.7 billion due to higher average selling prices. Shipments into the automotive market were down about 5 percent from the second quarter due to seasonal slowdowns at various OEMs.
Increased shipments and higher steel selling prices helped the company make up for higher costs in the quarter. Iron ore prices are expected to increase further in 2019. Fourth-quarter results are expected to decline due to a seasonal slowdown in shipments and lower average selling prices. Outage costs are expected to total $15 million in the fourth quarter compared to $4.7 million in the third quarter. That said, AK Steel executives said they expect fourth-quarter adjusted EBITDA to be among the best performances the company has seen in the last decade.
Operations are back to full capacity at the Middletown Works after a fire at the temper mill in the second quarter.
CEO Roger Newport noted that AK Steel’s advances in lightweighting solutions are providing new market opportunities for its products, such as NEXMET advanced high-strength steels. The company recently received a $1.2 million Department of Energy grant for the development of low-density steels for automotive structural applications.
Newport said AK Steel supports the Trump administration’s actions to address global steel overcapacity and unfair trade practices, as well as the new tentative trade agreement between Mexico, Canada and the U.S. The company continues to be concerned about the import of electrical steel downstream products that power the nation’s electrical grid and the attempts by other nations to circumvent Section 232 duties. U.S. production of those products is adequate, said Newport, and exclusion requests for electrical steel should be denied.
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Steel Mills
Algoma to shut down line in Ontario ahead of EAF start
The 106” Mill was part of Algoma's plate and strip combination facility.
Nippon trial vs. US government to begin early next month: Report
Nippon Steel’s litigation against the US government is set to begin in early February, according to a report by Japan’s Kyodo News Agency. Nippon will file its opening brief on Feb. 3. And both parties will conclude their claims by March 17 in the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, Kyodo […]
Nucor carbon targets certified by GSCC
Nucor’s “ambitious” carbon targets by the end of the decade and beyond have been certified by the Global Steel Climate Council (GSCC). The Charlotte, N.C.-based steelmaker used a base year of 2023 for its science-based emissions targets (SBET). It set an SBET of 0.975 metric tons (mt) of CO2 emissions per mt of hot-rolled steel […]
SSAB halts talks with Feds on Miss. green steel plant
The Department of Energy's Industrial Demonstrations Program page states that it is no longer moving forward with SSAB.
Cleveland-Cliffs CEO seeks ‘American solution’ for U.S. Steel
He said a new entity would operate under the U.S. Steel name and would retain its Pittsburgh headquarters.