SMU Data and Models
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2ed71/2ed7133fcc4b6aed8226144a3c5b1ae2098dfe02" alt=""
SMU Analysis: Imports of Cut-to-Length Plate by Region
Written by Peter Wright
September 13, 2018
Each month, Steel Market Update produces an import analysis by region for two of the six flat rolled product groups (HRC, CRC, HGD, OMC, CTL plate and coiled plate). This month, we are focusing on plate products. The intent of these regional updates is to bridge the gap between our monthly licensed data summaries and the detailed monthly reports that we produce for premium subscribers that cover import volume by port and source.
In the year to date through July 2018, 53.3 percent of all cut-to-length plate imports came in through the Great Lakes ports. The Gulf was in second place with 15.7 percent and the Rio Grande Valley third with 12.9 percent. The tonnage into the whole Pacific seaboard was minimal and even less into the Atlantic coast ports.
Imports into the U.S. as a whole were down by 18.2 percent year to date compared to 2017, but the Great Lakes were up by 9.0 percent and the Gulf was down by 48.5 percent. Figure 2 shows the percent change by region in 2018 compared to 2017.
Figures 3, 4, 5 and 6 show the history of CTL plate imports by region since March 2013 on a three-month moving average basis.
Imports through the Pacific Coast ports have been very erratic since the beginning of 2016, and currently both the North and South ports are at a low point.
CTL plate imports into the North Atlantic ports collapsed from mid-2016 to mid-2017 and have not recovered. Imports into the South Atlantic have been minimal throughout the whole time frame of this study.
Import volume into the Gulf has declined by 95 percent since March 2015 and is still trending down. Imports into the Great Lakes have been trending up in the same time frame.
Tonnage out of Mexico, mostly through Laredo, increased strongly last year, but has been trending down in 2018.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5457a/5457ae2ba1468c9a1853b2536e86841312ea9b24" alt=""
Peter Wright
Read more from Peter WrightLatest in SMU Data and Models
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1643d/1643db575e5c031fbca2639859382fe4441b6b05" alt=""
SMU Survey: Current Buyers’ Sentiment Index jumps, Future Sentiment slips
SMU’s Current Buyers’ Sentiment Index rocketed up this week, while the Future Buyers’ Sentiment Index edged down. The two indices are almost at parity.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/226d9/226d9b4d98ede05bee1f5738951198dc996994ea" alt=""
SMU Survey: Mill lead times stretch to 10-month highs
Buyers responding to our latest market survey reported that steel mill lead times were stretching out this week for sheet and plate products tracked by SMU. The results weren’t much of a surprise. Production times have begun moving out following a wave of frenzied buying in response to stricter Section 232 announced by the Trump […]
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cd5cc/cd5ccf8fcd610d16dc861faee6fe045ca677cc79" alt=""
SMU Survey: Mills slam door on buyers looking to talk price
Mills’ flexibility on price for spot orders has taken a nosedive to levels not seen since the end of March 2023.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1643d/1643db575e5c031fbca2639859382fe4441b6b05" alt=""
SMU Survey: Steel Buyers’ Sentiment indicates increased optimism
After reaching multi-month lows in mid-January, SMU’s Steel Buyers’ Sentiment Indices rebounded this week to some of the highest readings recorded in months.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1643d/1643db575e5c031fbca2639859382fe4441b6b05" alt=""
SMU Survey: Mill lead times fluctuate, extensions expected
While we have seen some movements in recent weeks, steel mill production times remain within a few days of the historical lows observed over the last two years, a trend observed since mid-2024.