Trade Cases
Leibowitz on Trade: Update on Section 232 on Automotive
Written by Tim Triplett
July 19, 2018
Lewis Leibowitz, trade attorney and contributor to Steel Market Update, offers the following commentary on the latest developments in Washington:
Today, the Commerce Department is conducting a hearing on the self-initiated Section 232 investigation into imports of autos and auto parts. The U.S. auto industry is uniformly opposed to tariffs on autos and auto parts. However, the president seems to be in favor of them. Yesterday, the president threatened “tremendous retribution” if auto and auto parts trade is not balanced more in favor of the U.S. Some critics of the tariffs have referred to today’s hearing as a “show trial.” There are reports that the president has asked for a Commerce decision before the November mid-term elections.
Perspective
In addition to automotive, the national security statute is being invoked for a fourth time (this time on uranium imports into the U.S.) because it is the easiest statute for the president to invoke without congressional approval. Congress is taking steps to require congressional approval of import remedies. Last week, a non-binding Senate resolution called on the president to consult with Congress before imposing import remedies that would hurt American industries and consumers who rely on imports.
This may be the last national security investigation for a while—but that is not clear by any means. Combined with the Section 301 actions on China, the imposition of tariffs and quotas on imports we have become used to may become a thing of the past. There may be more such investigations into other allegedly unfair acts and practices by U.S. trading partners. The aim appears to drive trading partners to negotiate trade deals more to the administration’s liking. Failing that (and there is little evidence that our trading partners are ready to negotiate), the tariffs could ultimately remake global supply chains.
Lewis Leibowitz
The Law Office of Lewis E. Leibowitz
1400 16th Street, N.W.
Suite 350
Washington, D.C. 20036
Phone: (202) 776-1142
Fax: (202) 861-2924
Cell: (202) 250-1551
Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Trade Cases
Supply chains, end-users brace for impact from tariffs
Supply chains are working through what the tariffs mean for them
Commerce releases prelim anti-dumping duties in sweeping trade case targeting CORE imports
The US Commerce Department on Friday released preliminary anti-dumping margins in a trade case targeted imports of coated flat-rolled steel from 10 countries. Certain countries and mills were hammered while others were largely spared. Brazilian steelmaker CSN, for example, received a preliminary rate of 137.76%. Some Turkish mills – including Boreclik and ArcelorMittal Celik Ticaret – received no dumping margin at all.
CRU: Trump’s sweeping tariffs could derail the US met coal industry
Latest tariffs could lead to US metallurgical coal exporters (many already high-cost swing producers) being priced out of the market.
Tariff fallout: Canada strikes back, Stellantis idles, GM boosts production
Canada imposes auto tariffs, while automaker Stellantis temporarily idles some plants.
Commerce tags UAE with ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case, South Africa spared
The Commerce Department has made a preliminary determination that ‘critical circumstances’ exist for certain imports of corrosion-resistant (CORE) flat-rolled steel from the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Commerce decided that critical circumstances did not apply to CORE from South Africa. The department also found that critical circumstances did not apply to CORE from UAE producers Al-Ghurair Iron & Steel LLC and United Iron & Steel Company LLC.