Trade Cases
AIIS Seeks Donations to Cover Costs of Section 232 Suit
Written by Tim Triplett
July 18, 2018
The American Institute for International Steel is seeking reinforcements in its legal battle over the constitutionality of the Trump administration’s Section 232 tariffs. In a letter to AIIS members and steel supply chain partners this week, the trade group solicited donations to help cover its legal bills.
“Legal costs and related expenses are mounting quickly. We will certainly be outspent by the government in this effort, but we will not be out-lawyered or out-worked,” wrote AIIS Chairman John D. Foster.
AIIS, along with Sim-Tex, LP, and Kurt Orban Partners, LLC, filed a lawsuit in the U.S. Court of International Trade last month alleging that the statute violates the constitutional prohibition against Congress delegating its legislative powers to the president. Doing so lacks any “intelligible principle” to limit the discretion of the president, charges the group. The lawsuit also asserts that Section 232 violates the constitutional principle of checks and balances as the president’s actions on trade are not subject to judicial review. Because Section 232 is unconstitutional, asserts AIIS, the president’s trade actions are, as well. If the court should find in favor of the plaintiffs, the Section 232 tariffs and quotas would be terminated and businesses that paid excess tariffs would be entitled to refunds.
A positive ruling also would prevent further use of Section 232 on the imports of automobiles and auto parts, which was the subject of a Commerce Department hearing in Washington today.
AIIS maintains that the 25 percent tariff on steel imports is unjustified and threatens the loss of revenues and jobs at companies throughout the supply chain. AIIS members include railroads, transportation companies, port authorities, union locals, traders and logistics companies, as well as foreign steel producers—all of which stand to be harmed by the reduction of steel imported into the United States.
Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Trade Cases
Price: Should billions in Section 232 revenue go to foreign manufacturers or to the American people?
Do we want the benefits of the Section 232 tariffs to flow to the bottom lines of foreign steel and aluminum producers or to the US government and, ultimately, domestic manufacturers and their workers? In our view, the answer is simple. Section 232 exceptions do nothing more than lead to underserved profits for foreign manufacturers who are harming the US industrial base. That revenue could be used to pursue the Trump administration’s other policy priorities - such as deficit reduction or expanded tax cuts.
Mills allege ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case vs. South Africa, UAE
"Recent activity in the marketplace strongly indicates that these imports are being rushed into the United States in an effort to avoid the imposition of antidumping duties," petitioners said.
European Commission eyes retaliation vs. Trump steel tariffs: Report
The European Commission is looking into making current quotas on steel imports stricter as a countermeasure to President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the US, according to an article in Reuters.
Trump could levy tariffs on auto imports in April: Report
President Donald Trump said last week that he could place tariffs on auto imports, according to an article in Politico.
Section 232 tariffs are headed downstream
The Trump administration has revealed the list of derivative steel products being added to the Section 232 tariff list.