Trade Cases
AIIS Seeks Donations to Cover Costs of Section 232 Suit
Written by Tim Triplett
July 18, 2018
The American Institute for International Steel is seeking reinforcements in its legal battle over the constitutionality of the Trump administration’s Section 232 tariffs. In a letter to AIIS members and steel supply chain partners this week, the trade group solicited donations to help cover its legal bills.
“Legal costs and related expenses are mounting quickly. We will certainly be outspent by the government in this effort, but we will not be out-lawyered or out-worked,” wrote AIIS Chairman John D. Foster.
AIIS, along with Sim-Tex, LP, and Kurt Orban Partners, LLC, filed a lawsuit in the U.S. Court of International Trade last month alleging that the statute violates the constitutional prohibition against Congress delegating its legislative powers to the president. Doing so lacks any “intelligible principle” to limit the discretion of the president, charges the group. The lawsuit also asserts that Section 232 violates the constitutional principle of checks and balances as the president’s actions on trade are not subject to judicial review. Because Section 232 is unconstitutional, asserts AIIS, the president’s trade actions are, as well. If the court should find in favor of the plaintiffs, the Section 232 tariffs and quotas would be terminated and businesses that paid excess tariffs would be entitled to refunds.
A positive ruling also would prevent further use of Section 232 on the imports of automobiles and auto parts, which was the subject of a Commerce Department hearing in Washington today.
AIIS maintains that the 25 percent tariff on steel imports is unjustified and threatens the loss of revenues and jobs at companies throughout the supply chain. AIIS members include railroads, transportation companies, port authorities, union locals, traders and logistics companies, as well as foreign steel producers—all of which stand to be harmed by the reduction of steel imported into the United States.
Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Trade Cases
Price on Trade: The foolishness of free trade with controlled economies
It was only a matter of time before a shutdown happened. And, no, we aren’t talking about the federal government’s lapse in appropriations. On Oct. 9, Beijing announced a series of restrictions that will effectively shut down exports of rare earth elements, magnets, and certain downstream products vital to advanced manufacturing.
Trump pulls plug on trade talks with Canada after anti-tariff Reagan ad
US President Donald Trump took to social media late Thursday night to announce he was canceling trade talks with Canada.
Leibowitz: Renewed trade war with China over rare earths
On Oct.10, President Trump announced major increases in tariffs on Chinese goods. The trigger was a new regime of export controls on rare earth metals and products using those elements, including magnets, capital equipment, and catalysts for catalytic converters in cars and trucks.
Industry piles on new Section 232 steel derivative inclusion requests
The Department of Commerce received 97 submissions from producers, manufacturers, and groups seeking Section 232 tariff coverage for steel and aluminum derivative products.
Price on Trade: New EU steel tariffs don’t mean the US should weaken its stance
Any steel imports into the EU that exceed the new, lower quota level would be subject to a 50% tariff, which represents a major increase from the EU’s current 25% out-of-quota tariff. This move would largely align the EU’s steel tariff rate with Canada and the United States.