Trade Cases
Texas Pipemaker Denied Exemption, Putting Expansion at Risk
Written by Sandy Williams
July 17, 2018
Houston-based pipe manufacturer Borusan Mannesmann Pipe U.S. has been denied a temporary exemption from Section 232 tariffs on steel imports.
Borusan was one of the first companies to file for product exemptions. After not getting a response, Joel Johnson, Borusan Mannesmann’s U.S CEO, decided to take a more direct approach and initiated a company postcard campaign appealing directly to the president and members of Congress. Johnson and Borusan workers penned letters to Washington, as well as the governor of Texas, requesting a two-year exemption in order to expand its Baytown, Texas, operations.
The company is prepared to invest in a $75 million expansion at Baytown and asked Commerce for a two-year exemption in order to get the facility built and operational. The proposed expansion would allow Borusan to end its steel imports from its parent company in Turkey and use only U.S.-manufactured steel. In June, Johnson told the Houston Business Journal that the company just needs a little breathing room while completing the project.
Johnson said tariffs have already cost the company about $2.5 million since they went into effect. Without an exemption, annual costs for the company are expected to be in the range of $25 million to $35 million, which would likely result in layoffs instead of the new hires expected from the expansion.
The denial Borusan received on July 6 was a form letter dated June 19, prior to the postcard campaign and the company’s national media blitz in support of the exemption.
In a comment to SMU, Johnson said, “Our company and our dedicated employees are very disappointed that the government did not accept our unique short-term application for a 232 steel tariff exemption in exchange for a significant financial investment and expansion in our Baytown, Texas, facility that would have created about 170 new well-paying jobs in the critical energy sector. At this time, we are reviewing all of our options.”
Objections to Borusan’s exemption came from the company’s pipe-making competitors who don’t want to see another factory in the area, said Johnson in an interview with Houston Matters. Domestic steel producers that Borusan buys from, like Nucor, SDI and Big River, didn’t file objections.
In his interview with Houston Matters, Johnson said the company will re-file. “We are giving President Trump what he wants, which is more domestic steel, more jobs, and more investment and stopping imports. We would stop importing [from our parent company in Turkey], but we need another factory to do that.”
Sandy Williams
Read more from Sandy WilliamsLatest in Trade Cases
CRU: Turkey imposes tariffs on steel imports; Malaysia launches AD probe
Ankara has placed anti-dumping duties of ranging from 6.10% to 43.31% on hot-rolled steel sheet from China, India, Japan, and Russia. Meanwhile, Malaysia has announced it will investigate allegedly dumped steel wire rod from China, Indonesia, and Vietnam.
Price on trade: The excess capacity threat moves closer to home
The Global Forum on Steel Excess Capacity (GFSEC) reaffirmed on Oct. 8 what domestic steel producers have long known—the threat of excess steel capacity never disappeared and is evolving. China’s steelmakers are boosting capacity and exports, echoing the 2016 global steel crisis. There is no doubt that China is successfully weaponizing excess capacity across many industries, and the fatal damage to domestic production and national security undermines the interests of all market-oriented countries. The question now is: How will GFSEC countries respond?
US bans steel made with forced labor from Baowu subsidiary
The US has banned imports from a subsidiary of the world’s largest steelmaker because it is allegedly using forced labor to produce steel products.
China challenges Canada’s tariffs on steel, aluminum, EVs
China is challenging Canada’s decision to put tariffs on imports of Chinese steel, aluminum, and electric vehicles.
Leibowitz: Harris, Trump don’t talk much about steel and trade – because they (mostly) agree
By most accounts, the issues that are most important for voters in this election are the economy, immigration, and abortion. International trade policy plays a key role in at least two of those three (the economy and immigration). Both presidential candidates recognize that trade and tariffs are an important focus. And “America first” is a rallying point for both candidates.