Trade Cases
Leibowitz on Trade: USTR Proposes More Tariffs on China
Written by Tim Triplett
July 12, 2018
Lewis Leibowitz, trade attorney and contributor to Steel Market Update, offers the following commentary on the latest developments in Washington:
In a sharp escalation of the trade war with China, the U.S. Trade Representative has released a list of about 5,000 items valued at around $200 billion that could be subject to new 10 percent tariffs on Chinese imports if adopted after a public hearing next month. The USTR issued the list on Tuesday at the direction of President Trump.
Following are the products that could be affected. The list includes exceptions that appear strategic in nature to avoid consumer injury and annoyance (such as tariffs on pharmaceuticals and aircraft) and to avoid Chinese retaliation (on pharmaceuticals and aircraft).
The list includes tariffs on metal products from Chapters 71, 72 and 73. The new list targets precious metals (gold, platinum, silver), iron and steel waste and scrap, steel shapes and other advanced products made of iron and steel, aluminum tanks, powders and other products. Classified in Chapter 73, “articles of steel,” are products such as steel circles, steel netting and fencing, and other equipment made principally of iron or steel (heading 7326) that were not targeted before. A large number of aluminum products classified in Chapter 76 are included, as are selected products in all HTSUS Chapters covering metals (Chapters 71-83).
Also potentially subject to the new tariffs are agricultural products in Chapters 1-24, with a few exceptions: no items in Chapter 1 (live animals), Chapter 6 (live plants), Chapter 9 (coffee and tea), Chapter 13 (gums and resins) or Chapter 18 (cocoa).
Other chapters with no items include Chapter 30 (pharmaceuticals), Chapter 49 (books), Chapters 61-64 (apparel and footwear), Chapter 66 (umbrellas), and Chapters 92-93 (musical instruments, arms and ammunition). Only one item, parachutes, is included from Chapter 88. All other chapters have at least two items.
The list of proposed tariffs is subject to public comment. The due date for filing requests to appear and a summary of expected testimony at the public hearing, and for filing pre-hearing submissions, is July 27. The due date for submission of written comments is Aug. 17.
The Section 301 Committee will convene a public hearing in the main hearing room of the U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW, Washington, D.C., beginning at 9:30 a.m. on Aug. 20-23. The due date for submission of post-hearing rebuttal comments is Aug. 30.
More lists could be forthcoming. In 2017, imports of goods from China totaled $505 billion. With the new $200 billion list, the total trade affected by Section 301 tariffs would be about $250 billion, or half the imports from China. The Section 232 tariffs affect another $3 billion or so from China.
The other half of U.S. trade with China, which so far has been unaffected, could also be included. If pharmaceuticals and aircraft are hit with tariffs, China would likely retaliate on those products, affecting some of the largest exporters in the United States.
Another possibility is an increase in the size of the tariff. The 10 percent tariff rate could be increased. Ten percent tariffs will not stop trade in most products, but will be an annoyance to businesses and consumers. Higher tariffs could seriously constrain trade volumes.
And the end is not in sight. The avowed purpose of the Section 301 tariffs is to change China’s behavior in trade—intellectual property theft, technology transfer, investment restrictions and the like. As the notice makes clear, China’s behavior has not changed, prompting the additional $200 billion list. If the new tariffs do not effect a change in China’s behavior or negotiations, there will be other restrictions.
U.S. exports to China in 2017 totaled about $129 billion. With the publication of the $200 billion list, USTR has escalated the fight. China cannot retaliate on $200 billion in U.S. exports because U.S. exports to China are not that high. Therefore, China will look for other ways to retaliate, spreading the trade war to other sectors (such as services) or non-tariff areas and possibly non-trade areas.
Lewis Leibowitz
The Law Office of Lewis E. Leibowitz
1400 16th Street, N.W.
Suite 350
Washington, D.C. 20036
Phone: (202) 776-1142
Fax: (202) 861-2924
Cell: (202) 250-1551
Tim Triplett
Read more from Tim TriplettLatest in Trade Cases
Price: Should billions in Section 232 revenue go to foreign manufacturers or to the American people?
Do we want the benefits of the Section 232 tariffs to flow to the bottom lines of foreign steel and aluminum producers or to the US government and, ultimately, domestic manufacturers and their workers? In our view, the answer is simple. Section 232 exceptions do nothing more than lead to underserved profits for foreign manufacturers who are harming the US industrial base. That revenue could be used to pursue the Trump administration’s other policy priorities - such as deficit reduction or expanded tax cuts.
Mills allege ‘critical circumstances’ in CORE trade case vs. South Africa, UAE
"Recent activity in the marketplace strongly indicates that these imports are being rushed into the United States in an effort to avoid the imposition of antidumping duties," petitioners said.
European Commission eyes retaliation vs. Trump steel tariffs: Report
The European Commission is looking into making current quotas on steel imports stricter as a countermeasure to President Trump’s recently announced tariffs on steel and aluminum imports to the US, according to an article in Reuters.
Trump could levy tariffs on auto imports in April: Report
President Donald Trump said last week that he could place tariffs on auto imports, according to an article in Politico.
Section 232 tariffs are headed downstream
The Trump administration has revealed the list of derivative steel products being added to the Section 232 tariff list.